Journal Information
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Available online 13 June 2024
Experience with dulaglutide in a diabetic and obese patient on incremental peritoneal dialysis
Experiencia con dulaglutida en un paciente diabético y obeso en diálisis peritoneal incremental
Visits
115
Silvia González Sanchidrián
Corresponding author
, Sandra Gallego Domínguez, Elena Jiménez Mayor, Pedro Jesús Labrador Gómez, Javier Deira Lorenzo
Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Cáceres, Cáceres, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Analytical evolution monitoring and parameters of peritoneal dialysis.
Full Text
Dear Editor,

We read with interest the case recently published by De la Flor et al. “Efficacy and safety of semaglutide in a diabetic and obese patient on incremental hemodialysis. Does it also contribute to preserving residual renal function?”,1 to which we would like to contribute our experience in incremental peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Diabetic kidney disease is associated with an excessive increase in morbidity and mortality, especially of cardiovascular origin, and also increases progression of CKD.2

Glucagon-like peptide type 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 ARs) are a family of antihyperglycemic drugs that have demonstrated strong reduction of HbA1c levels, low risk of hypoglycemia, weight reduction and cardiovascular and renal benefits.3 In addition, the authors also describe favorable effects on preservation of residual renal function (RRF) in a patient on incremental hemodialysis.1 However, experience in dialysis patients is limited.4

We present a 71-year-old male with type 2 diabetes mellitus, kidney disease secondary to diabetic nephropathy and repeated episodes of renal stones, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia and a history of past tobacco use. His body mass index (BMI) was 32.9kg/m2 and his abdominal perimeter, 110cm.

He started PD in 2020 incrementally with two exchanges per day, one of 2000 cc of physioneal® 40 1.36% and one of nocturnal icodextrin; he was in temporary contraindication for kidney transplantation due to grade 1 obesity. Serum creatinine was 6.39mg/dl, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured by CKD-EPI was 8ml/min/1.73m2, creatinine clearance (ClCr) and urea clearance (KrU) were 12.2 and 6.1ml/min/1.73m2, respectively, both in 24-h urine; the GFR by mean level of ClCr and KrU was 9.2ml/min/1.73m2 and proteinuria was 1.680mg/24h.

Despite good glycemic control with 18 UI/day of insulin glargine, dulaglutide was added to the treatment due to its effect on weight reduction and to improve metabolic control in PD, with the expectation of making possible renal transplantation. The starting dose was 0.75mg subcutaneously weekly, increasing to 1.5mg/weekly at 1 month, with good tolerance and no hypoglycemia.

At the beginning of the treatment there were no data for hyperhydration. At 4 weeks there was a significant reduction in the percentage of fat mass (26.8%) and an increase in lean mass (20.2%). At 44 weeks the weight loss was 10.4kg, insulin requirements were reduced by more than 50%, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was reduced by 16.4% and BMI by 11.6%; as for the lipid profile, triglycerides were reduced by 44.7%, total cholesterol by 47.3% and LDL by up to 65.5%. During follow-up, the dose of antihypertensive drugs was reduced, an effect that can probably be attributed to the decrease in weight, as well as the decrease in insulin therapy.

From the renal point of view, diuresis remained around 2L/day. ClCr and KrU initially fell, as did total weekly Kt/V (at the expense mainly of renal Kt/V) to gradually increase throughout the evolution until stabilizing. Urinary creatinine and urea excretion, normalized to kilo of weight, increased from week 12 of treatment. The normalized protein catabolism rate (nPCR) was stable (Table 1). The patient received a kidney transplant 14 months after starting treatment with dulaglutide.

Table 1.

Analytical evolution monitoring and parameters of peritoneal dialysis.

  Basal  Week 4  Week 8  Week 12  Week 20  Week 28  Week 36  Week 44 
Analytical, glycemic and body composition parameters
Hb (g/dl)  11.3  11.3  10.8  10.3  11.4  14  14.2  12.3 
Na+ (mmol/l)  138  136  138  140  137  138  139  145 
K+ (mmol/l)  5.2  4.5  4.7  5.1  4.5  4.8  4.6  4.6 
Serum albumin (mg/dl)  3.8  3.7  5.1  4.5  4.8  4.6  4.6 
Triglycerides (mg/dl)  188  278  138  147  135  144  144  104 
Total cholesterol (mg/dl)  188  145  97  123  118  125  121  99 
HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)  34  33  29  36  31  34  35  38 
LDL cholesterol (mg/dl)  116  65  40  58  60  62  57  40 
Serum glucose (mg/dl)  206  128  109  96  82  84  85  87 
HbA1c (%)  6.1  5.4  5.46  5.2  NA  5.1  NA  NA 
Weight (kg).  89.5  87.6  86.8  85.8  85.3  83.5  80.4  79.1 
IMC (kg/m)2  32.9  32.2  31.9  31.5  31.3  30.7  29.5  29.1 
Abdominal circumference (cm)  110  109  106  106  104  104  104  102 
Lean tissue index (kg/m)2  16.8  20.2  13.3  15.3  NA  13.5  14.8  NA 
Fat tissue index (kg/m)2  14.9  10.9  17.4  15.2  NA  15.8  13.9  NA 
Absolute overhydration (liters)  0.3  0.9  1.1  NA  −0.2  NA 
Insulin glargine (IU/day)  18  14  12  10  10  10  10 
Dulaglutide (mg/week)  0.75  1.5  1.5  1.5  1.5  1.5  1.5  1.5 
Evolution of residual renal function and dialytic parameters
Serum creatinine (mg/dl)  7.1  7.3  8.1  8.5  8.2  9.2  9.7 
CKD-EPI (ml/min/1.73m)2 
Serum urea (mg/dl)  151  134  129  150  126  149  141  144 
Creatinine urine (mg/dl)  76  52  37  59  NA  73  NA  73 
Urea urine (mg/dl)  968  618  470  827  NA  843  NA  753 
Residual diuresis (ml/24h)  1.800  2.000  2.000  2.000  NA  1.700  NA  1.900 
KrU (ml/min)  6.4  5.1  7.7  NA  6.7  NA  6.9 
ClCro (ml/min/1.73m)2  13.4  9.9  6.3  9.6  NA  9.5  NA  9.9 
FGR (ml/min/1.73m)2  10.7  8.15  11.4  8.65  NA  8.1  NA  8.4 
ClU (l/wk)  109.5  89.4  77.8  104.4  NA  90.5  NA  94.2 
Kt/V weekly total  2.52  2.08  1.83  2.47  NA  2.22  NA  2.33 
Kt/V weekly peritoneal  0.57  0.58  0.63  0.65  NA  0.57  NA  0.61 
Kt/V weekly renal  1.95  1.50  1.20  1.82  NA  1.65  NA  1.72 
ClCr (l/wk)  150.3  105.3  82  111  NA  104.6  NA  108.3 
ClCr (l/wk/1.73m)2  132.8  93.9  73.4  99.7  NA  96.3  NA  100.1 
Cr U/kg (mg/kg)  15.4  11.8  8.4  13.7  NA  14.8  NA  17.5 
U U/kg (mg/kg)  194.4  141.6  108.3  192.3  NA  171.3  NA  180.8 
nPCR (g/kg/day)  1.1  0.9  0.8  1.2  NA  1.1  NA  1.1 
CAC (mg/g)  340  NA  NA  NA  NA  NA  NA  481 
PAS (mmHg)  129  132  112  128  145  130  127  130 
PAD (mmHg)  68  63  74  65  70  66  66  62 

CAC: albumin/creatinine ratio; CKD-EPI: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration estimate of glomerular filtration rate; ClCr: creatinine clearance; ClCro: creatinine clearance in 24h urine; ClU: urea clearance; Cr U/kg: urinary creatinine excretion per kilogram of body weight; Hb: hemoglobin; Hb1Ac: glycated hemoglobin; HDL: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; BMI: body mass index; K+: plasma potassium; KrU: renal clearance of residual urea; Kt/V: dialysis treatment efficacy; LDL: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NA: not assigned; Na+: plasma sodium; nPCR: normalized protein catabolism rate; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; U U/kg: urinary urea excretion per kilogram of body weight.

To date, case series have been published with GLP-1 ARs in PD that have proven their efficacy and safety, but to our knowledge there is no previous experience with these drugs in patients on incremental PD or their effect on RRF, which is important.5,6

As described by De la Flor et al.,1 we observed a significant decrease in weight, abdominal perimeter and HbA1c and an improvement in blood pressure control, lipid profile and preservation of RRF. In our group, we consider that RRF brings great benefits to dialysis patients, so we adjusted the dosage of GLP-1 ARs accordingly.7

The 2022 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines on the management of diabetes emphasize the cardiovascular and renal benefits of GLP-1 ARs.2 Weight reduction is a fundamental objective in the nephroprotection of patients with diabetic RD and obesity is an important limitation for inclusion in the renal transplant waiting list.8 On the other hand, preservation of RRF is essential for the survival of the technique in PD.9 In addition to the cardiovascular benefits, GLP-1 ARs can be an excellent treatment option in diabetic and obese patients on PD.

In our experience, dulaglutide has proven to be an effective and safe option in obese diabetic patients on incremental PD with metabolic and RRF benefits.

References
[1]
J.C. De la Flor, J. Deira, T. Monzón, F. Valga, C. Albarracín, E. Ruiz, et al.
Eficacia y seguridad de la semaglutida en un paciente diabético y obeso en hemodiálisis incremental. ¿Contribuye también a preservar la función renal residual?.
Nefrología., 43 (2023), pp. 491-515
[2]
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group.
KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease.
Kidney Int., 102 (2022), pp. S1-S127
[3]
J.L. Górriz, M.J. Soler, J.F. Navarro-González, C. García-Carro, M.J. Puchades, L. D’Marco, et al.
GLP-1 receptor agonists and diabetic kidney disease: a call of attention to nephrologists.
J Clin Med., 9 (2020), pp. 947
[4]
S. Saito, T. Nakao.
Semaglutide, a newly available glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist, shows remarkable favorable effects in hemodialysis patients with obesity and Type 2 diabetes.
Ther Apher Dial., 26 (2022), pp. 242-243
[5]
T. Hiramatsu, A. Ozeki, K. Asai, M. Saka, A. Hobo, S. Furuta.
Liraglutide improves glycemic and blood pressure control and ameliorates progression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on peritoneal dialysis.
Ther Apher Dial., 19 (2015), pp. 598-605
[6]
L.V. Jacobsen, C. Hindsberger, R. Robson, M. Zdravkovic.
Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide.
Br J Clin Pharmacol., 68 (2009), pp. 898-905
[7]
J. Deira, M.A. Suárez, F. López, E. García-Cabrera, A. Gascón, E. Torregrosa, et al.
IHDIP: a controlled randomized trial to assess the security and effectiveness of the incremental hemodialysis in incident patients.
BMC Nephrol., 20 (2019), pp. 8
[8]
A. Cases.
Agonistas del receptor de péptido similar al glucagón tipo 1 (GLP-1) en el manejo del paciente con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Una aproximación para el nefrólogo.
Nefrología., 43 (2023), pp. 399-412
[9]
J. Perl, J.M. Bargman.
The importance of residual kidney function for patients on dialysis: a critical review.
Am J Kidney Dis., 53 (2009), pp. 1068-1081
Copyright © 2023. Sociedad Española de Nefrología
Idiomas
Nefrología (English Edition)
Article options
Tools