Journal Information
Vol. 29. Issue. 4.August 2009
Pages 285-378
Vol. 29. Issue. 4.August 2009
Pages 285-378
Full text access
Analysis of variability in determining intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) according to the method used to process the sample
ANÁLISIS DE LA VARIABILIDAD EN LA DETERMINACIÓN DE LA PTH SEGÚN EL MÉTODO EMPLEADO PARA PROCESAR LA MUESTRA
Visits
9411
Ana Isabel Morales Garcíaa, José Luis Górriz Teruela, Mª Carmen Plancha Mansaneta, Verónica Escudero Quesadaa, Luis Manuel Pallardó Mateua
a Servicio de Nefrología y Servicio de Medicina Nuclear Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset Valencia, Valencia, España,
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (3)
Show moreShow less

Introducción: Las alteraciones del metabolismo óseo-mineral presentan una alta prevalencia en los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica (ERC), siendo mayor conforme avanza el estadio de enfermedad. El diagnóstico de dichas alteraciones se basa fundamentalmente en la determinación de niveles de hormona paratiroide (PTH-i). Sin embargo, la determinación de esta hormona no es sencilla y está sometida a gran variabilidad. Los métodos para procesar las muestras de PTH-i no están estandarizados, hecho que podría ser una fuente importante de variabilidad preanalítica. Objetivo: Analizar la variabilidad en los resultados de la determinación de la PTH-i comparando distintas formas de procesar la misma muestra de plasma tratado conácido etilendiaminotetraacético (EDTA) en pacientes con ERC. Material y métodos: Se han analizado 294 muestras, correspondientes a 49 pacientes con ERC, 18 procedentes de la Consulta de Trasplante Renal (36,7%) y 31 del programa de Hemodiálisis Crónica de nuestro Centro (63,3%). Se ha procesado la misma muestra de cada uno de nuestros pacientes de seis maneras distintas, comparando las medias entre el grupo de referencia o gold standard y los otros grupos a estudio. Las muestras se procesaron con diferentes condiciones de temperatura y tiempo antes de ser congeladas, constituyendo seis grupos: centrifugación y congelación inmediata (grupo 1, de referencia); muestra a temperatura ambiente una hora, centrifugación y mantenimiento en nevera (2-8 ºC) durante 0, 8 o 24 horas (grupos 2 A, 2B y 2C, respectivamente); mantenimiento de sangre a temperatura ambiente 3 horas, mantenimiento en nevera (2-8 ºC) durante 0 y 8 horas (grupos 3A y 3B). La PTH-i se ha determinado mediante Inmunoradiometria (IRMA Total Intact Scantibodies assay). Se ha realizado el test de homogeneidad de varianzas y normalidad, y depués comparaciones por pares con el t-test con la corrección de Bonferroni. Resultados: La PTH-intacta media en el grupo de referencia fue 202,5 ± 199,72 pg/ml. Las medias de PTH-intacta en distintos grupos analizados fueron 196 ± 203,23 pg/ml, 202,8 ± 200,2 pg/ml, 200,06 ± 194,87 pg/ml, 204,08 ± 204,073 pg/ml, 197,94 ± 182,31 pg/ml. Los resultados fueron prácticamente superponibles, no encontrando diferencias significativas respecto al grupo de referencia (p = 0,87, p = 0,99, p = 0,95, p = 0,96, p = 0,90 al comparar con grupos 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A y 3B, respectivamente). Conclusiones: La utilización de EDTA como conservante en el procesamiento de las muestras analíticas para la determinación sanguínea de PTH-i permite un mayor tiempo de procesamiento de la misma, sin la exigencia de su congelación inmediata, mostrando una mínima variabilidad en los resultados obtenidos según diferentes formas de procesamiento. Estos resultados pueden ayudar a establecer estrategias logísticas para el procesamiento de muestras sanguíneas en los pacientes con ERC.

Palabras clave:
Procesamiento muestras
Palabras clave:
PTH
Palabras clave:
Estabilidad
Palabras clave:
Variabilidad

Background: The measurement of i-PTH circulating is not easy due to its analytical variablity. Variability that appears in the process that goes from the sample collection to the final result determination. There are several important aspects that can influence within the pre-test variability: type of sample (serum o plasma), temperature, time elapses from blood extraction to freezing and from freezing to i-PTH quantification. Blood coming from centres far from our laboratory do not always meet the required processing conditions. Our aim was to study the stability of i-PTH with varying conditions of temperature and time until freezing in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Method: We have analyzed 294 blood samples of 49 patients with chronic kidney disease (18 transplantated patients (36.7%) and 31 patients in haemodyalisis (63.3%)). The blood samples were collected using tubes treated with ethylenediaminotetraacetic acid (EDTA); these samples were subjected to different conditions of temperature and time before they were frozen, constituting 6 groups: blood centrifuged and plasma immediately frozen (group A or reference group); blood maintained 1 hour at room temperature and plasma stored at 2-8 ºC during 0, 8 and 24 hours (groups B,C,D); blood maintained 3 hours at room temperature and plasma stored at 2-8 ºC during 0 and 8 hours (groups E,F). The intact PTH (i-PTH) was measured using the immunoradiometric assay (IRMA Total Intact Scantibodies assay). We have analyzed the differences between the PTH-i mean values in the referenced groud and the others. We have applied the tests of homogeneity variance and normality and we have perform a comparation by pairs with the t-test including the Bonferroni correction. Results: The mean value of intact- PTH in the referente Group was 202.5±199.72 pg/ml. The means values of intact-PTH in the other groups were 196 ± 203.23 pg/ml, 202.8 ± 200.2 pg/ml, 200.06 ± 194.87 pg/ml, 204.08 ± 204.073 pg/ml, 197.94 ± 182.31 pg/ml. The results were practically identical for each group. We did not find important differences with respect to the reference group (p = 0.87, p = 0,99, p = 0,95, p = 0,96, p = 0,90 when comparing with groups 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a y 3b). Conclusions: The use of EDTA maintain the PTH stability during a longer period without the necessity of freezing the samples immediately. These results can help to state strategies to management the samples in patients with ERC.

Keywords:
processing conditions samples
Keywords:
PTH
Keywords:
stability
Keywords:
Variability
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

Alterations in the calcium-phosphorus metabolism are a prevalent problem and of great importance to patients with CKD (chronic kidney disease).1-8 Appropriate and early evaluation, as well as treatment is vital for optimum control of our patients.

The ideal diagnostic method for the grade and type of renal osteodystrophy is still iliac crest biopsy following tetracycline double labelling,9-25 but, due to its invasive and toilsome nature, it is of difficult application in daily clinical practice.26 At present, diagnosis and treatment of these alterations are based on the determination of plasmatic levels of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH).10,17,27-31 However, the determination of this hormone is not simple and is subjected to great variability.32-34 In addition to this, methods used to process the iPTH samples are not standardised, a fact which could be an important source of pre-test variability.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To analyse variability in iPTH determination results comparing different methods of processing the same sample of plasma treated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in patients with CKD at different stages of development.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

In our study, we analysed 294 blood samples from 49 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at different stages of development, 18 were from transplanted patients at the Renal Transplant Unit (36.7%) and 31 from the Chronic Haemodialysis Unit at our hospital (63.3%).

All the blood samples were collected in the morning (between 8 and 9 am) after an eight hour fast and predialysis for the patients undergoing substitutive kidney treatment. The blood was drawn at the Haemodialysis Service of our hospital. Three tubes of EDTA were extracted from each patient: two 5ml tubes and one 10ml tube. Immediately after the extraction, they were sent to the refrigerator at the Nuclear Medicine Department, where each was processed differently, as will be described herewith.

Reference group or group 1 (EDTA 5ml tube):

- Blood sample collected (and quickly sent refrigerated to the Nuclear Medicine Department).

- Refrigerated centrifugation.

- Plasma immediately frozen.

Group 2 (EDTA 10ml tube):

- Blood sample collected.

- Maintained one hour at room temperature.

- Normal centrifugation.

- Separated into 3 tubes:

- One of the tubes is immediately frozen. Group 2A

- One tube is refrigerated for eight hours and then frozen. Group 2B

- Another tube is refrigerated for > 24 hours and frozen. Group 2C

Group 3 (EDTA 5ml tube):

- Blood sample collected.

- Maintained > 3 hours at room temperature.

- Normal centrifugation.

- Separated into two tubes:

- Immediately frozen. Group 3A

- One tube is refrigerated for > 8 hours and frozen. Group 3B

The processing methods used for the blood samples in our study were those usually applied in this domain. The iPTH was measured using the immunoradiometric assay (IRMA Total Intact Scantibodies assay, 2nd generation). The withinrun variability obtained was less than 2.5%. Group 1 was considered the gold standard, since these are the generally recommended conditions for this type of samples, independently of the method or preservative used (EDTA or citrate).

A two by two comparison was performed between the iPTH mean values in the reference group and the others. Therefore, the distribution normality was checked first by applying tests of homogeneity variance and normality. Subsequently, we performed a comparison by pairs with the t-test including the Bonferroni correction. The level of significance was established at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The average age of the population studied was 60.88 ± 17.65 and the age range between 26 and 90 years. Of the 49 patients included in the study, 25 were female and 24 male, which corresponds to 51 and 49%, respectively. The main cause of chronic kidney disease is non-affiliated, followed by vascular and glomerular origin. The remaining descriptive features of our study population are displayed in table 1.

The mean value in the reference group was 202.25 ± 199.72pg/ml. The mean values of intact iPTH in the other groups analysed, displayed in table 2, were 196 ± 203.23pg/ml, 202.8 ± 200.2pg/ml, 200.06 ± 194.87pg/ml, 204.08 ± 204.073pg/ml and 197.94 ± 182.31pg/ml. As can be seen in figure 1, the results were practically identical for each group, with no important differences with respect to the reference group (p = 0.87, p = 0.99, p = 0.95, p = 0.96, p = 0.90), when comparing with groups 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a and 3b, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Parathormone serum determination is difficult to quantify since it is quite unstable both in serum and in the blood43-45 (av. 5 minutes). The reference method is based on refrigerated spinning and freezing the sample immediately after extraction. However, this procedure is very difficult in daily clinical practice, since nephrology activity is not only limited to the hospital domain. In general, samples are drawn at the clinics and then sent to the referral hospitals for analysis. On occasion, these clinics are at quite a distance from the hospitals. Most of the samples are not spun or separated in the place of extraction because they do not have the means required to do so. In addition to this, the samples are spun at room temperature. We can derive from this the importance of knowing and reducing the variability to a maximum in the handling of samples.

At present, there is no standardised method of processing them. There is some controversy on the stability of parathormone in serum or plasma treated with EDTA. Several studies state that the determination of iPTH in serum is less stable than that obtained from plasma and blood sample conserved in tubes treated with EDTA.35-42 However, Omar et al.38 in 2001 observed that the levels of iPTH in EDTA decreased 14.8% after remaining at room temperature for 48 hours. In addition to this, recently, Cavalier et al.42 proved that samples processed with EDTA are not always more stable than in serum. They argue that the stability of the iPTH after 24 hours at -20ºC is greater in serum than for plasma treated with EDTA.

In almost all the studies performed to date, serum and EDTA are compared.35-42 However, one of the limitations which our study presents is that a control group with serum (citrate) was not established. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the determinations of the iPTH in serum and plasma (EDTA) once frozen at -20ºC, nor compare this with the findings of Cavalier et al. In addition to this, we have not analysed what occurs after 48 hours at room temperature in order to compare with the Omar et al. results.

The findings of this study show no significant differences between the reference group and the other groups analysed. It is confirmed that the plasma samples treated with EDTA are stable and its use is recommended with refrigerated centrifugation and immediate freezing is difficult to achieve.

CONCLUSION

The use of EDTA as a preservative in the processing of analytical samples for the blood determination of iPTH allows for greater processing time without the requirement of immediate freezing, displaying a minimal variability in the results obtained according to different methods of processing. These results can help to establish logistical strategies for the processing of blood samples in CKD patients.

Table 1. Descriptive features of the study population

Table 2. Mean iPTH value (pg/ml) for each group studied

Figure 1.

Bibliography
[1]
1.- Mann JFE, Gerstein HC, Pogue J, et al. Renal Insufficiency as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Outcomes and the Impact of Ramipril: The HOPE Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:629-636. [Pubmed]
[2]
2.- Sarnak MJ, Levey As. Cardiovascular disease and chronic renal disease: a new paradigm. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35 (4 Suppl 1):117-131.
[3]
3.- Ganesh SK, Stack AG, Levin NW et al. Association of elevated serum PO(4), Ca x PO (4) product, and parathyroid hormone with cardiac mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol.2001;12(10):2131-2138.
[4]
4.- Block GA, Klassen PS, Lazarus JM et al. Mineral metabolism, mortality and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol.2004;15(8):2208-2218. [Pubmed]
[5]
5.- Young EW, Albert JM, Satayathum S, et al. Predictors and consequences of altered mineral metabolism: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Kidney Int2005;67(3):1179-1187.
[6]
6.- Kestenbaum B, Sampson JN, Rudser KD, et al. Kesten Serum Phosphate Levels and Mortality Risk among People with Chronic Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16:520-528.
[7]
7.- Portolés J, Górriz JL, Martinez-Castelao A, et al. Manejo de la osteodistrofia en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica. Estudio MERENA. SEN. Málaga, Octubre 2005.
[8]
8.- J Nieto, J L Górriz, JE Fernandez-Nájera, LM Molinero, J Bover, G Barril, F Caravaca, ALM de Francisco. En representación del grupo de estudio. Epidemiología de la enfermedad ósea en la enfermedad renal crónica ambulatoria en España. Estudio OSERCE. Sociedad Valenciana de Nefrología. Alcoy, Mayo 2007.
[9]
9.- Sherrard DJ, Hercz G, Pei Y, et al. The spectrum of bone disease in end-stage renal failure-An evolving disorde. Kidney Int 1993;43:436. [Pubmed]
[10]
10.- Hutchison Aj, Whitehose RW, Boulton HF et al. Correlation of bone histology with parathyroid hormone, vitamin D3 and radiology in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 1993;44:1071. [Pubmed]
[11]
11.- Malluche HH, Ritz E, Hodgson M, et al. Skeletal lesions and calcium metabolism in early renal failure. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 1975; 11: 443. [Pubmed]
[12]
12.- Llach F, Massry SG, Singer FR, et al. Skeletal resistance to endogenous parathyroid hormona in patients with early renal failure. A posible cause for secondary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1975; 41:339. [Pubmed]
[13]
13.- Malluche HH, Ritz E, Lange HP, et al. Bone histology in incipient and advanced renal failure. Kidney Int 1976; 9: 355. [Pubmed]
[14]
14.- Sherrad DJ, Baylink DJ, Wergedal JE, Maloney NA. Quantitative histological studies on the pathogenesis of uremia bone disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1974; 39:119. [Pubmed]
[15]
15.- Fournier A, Oprisiu R, Hottelart C et al. Renal osteodystrophy in dialysis patients: Diagnosis and treatment. Artif Organs 1998; 22:530. [Pubmed]
[16]
16.- Coen G, Mazzaferro S, Ballanti P, et al. Renal bone disease in 76 patients with varying degrees of predialysis chronic renal failure: A cross-sectional study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11:813. [Pubmed]
[17]
17.- Wang M, Hercz G, Sherrard DJ, et al. Relationship between intact 1-84 parathyroid hormona and bone histomorphometric parameters in dialysis patients without aluminum toxicity. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 26:836. [Pubmed]
[18]
18.- Hernández D, Concepción MT, Lorenzo V, et al. Adynamic bone disease with negative aluminium staining in predialysis patients: prevalence and evolution alter maintenance dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994; 9:517. [Pubmed]
[19]
19.- Andrés DL, Hercz G, COP JB, et al. Bone histomorphometry of renal osteodystrophy in diabetic patients. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2: 525. [Pubmed]
[20]
20.- Malluche HH, Monier-Faugere MC. The role of bone biopsy in the management of patients with renal osteodystrophy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 4: 1631. [Pubmed]
[21]
21.- Faugere MC, Malluche HH. Stainable aluminum and not aluminum content reflects bone histology in dialyzed patients. Kidney Int 1986; 30:717. [Pubmed]
[22]
22.- Teitelbaum SL. Renal osteodystrophy. Hum Pathol 1984; 15:306. [Pubmed]
[23]
23.- Malluche HH, Langub MC, Monier-Faugere MC. The role of bone biopsy in clinical practice and research. Kidney Int Suppl 1999;73: S20.
[24]
24.- Malluche HH, Langub MC, Monier-Faugere MC. Pathogenesis and histology of renal osteodystrophy. Osteoporos Int 1997;7(Suppl 3): S184. [Pubmed]
[25]
25.- Freemont T. Histological diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy. Kidney Int Suppl 1999;73:S26.
[26]
26.- Hodgson, SF. Skeletal remodeling and renal osteodystrophy. Semin Nephrol 1986;6:42. [Pubmed]
[27]
27.- Qi Q, Monier-Faugere MC, Geng Z, Malluche HH. Predictive value of serum parathyroid hormone levels for bone turnover in patients on chronic maintenance dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1995;26:622. [Pubmed]
[28]
28.- Carmen Sanchez M, Auxiliadora Bajo M, Selgas R, et al. Parathormone secretion in peritoneal dialysis patients with adynamic bone disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;36:953. [Pubmed]
[29]
29.- Gerakis A, Hutchison AJ, Apostolou T, et al. Biochemical markers for non-invasive diagnosis of hyperparathyroid bone disease and adynamic bone in patients on haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:2430. [Pubmed]
[30]
30.- Ziolkowska H, Paniczyk-Tomaszewska M, Debinski A, et al. Bone biopsy results and serum bone turnover parameters in uremia children. Acta Paediatr 2000;89:666. [Pubmed]
[31]
31.- Solal ME, Sebert JL, Boudailliez B et al. Comparison of intact, midregion and carboxy terminal assays of parathyroid hormone for the diagnosis of bone disease in hemodialyzed patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;73:516. [Pubmed]
[32]
32.- Souberbielle JC, Boutten A, Carlier MC et al. Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients. Kidney International 2006;70:345-350.
[33]
33.- Cantor T, Yang Z, Caraiani N and Llamathi E. Lack of comparability of intact parathyroid hormone measurements among commercial assays for end-stage renal disease patients: Implication for treatment decisions.Clinical Chemistry 2006;52: 1771-1776. [Pubmed]
[34]
34.- Ureña Torres P. The need for reliable serum parathyroid hormone measurements. Kidney International 2006;70: 240-243.
[35]
35.- Inaba M, Nakatsuka K, Imanishi Y et al. Technical and clinical characterization of the Bio-PTH (1-84) immunochemiluminometric assay and comparison with a second-generation assay for parathyroid hormone. Clinical Chemistry 2004;50: 385-390. [Pubmed]
[36]
36.- Levin GE and Nisbet JA. Stability of parathyroid hormone-related protein and parathyroid hormone at room temperature. Ann Clin Biochem 1994;31: 497-500. [Pubmed]
[37]
37.- Kay S, Walker and John Seth. Stability of parathyroid hormone in blood from renal patients on haemodialysis. Ann Clin Biochem 2000;37: 800-801. [Pubmed]
[38]
38.- Omar H, Chamberlin A, Walker V and Wood PJ. Immulite 2000 parathyroid hormone assay: stability of parathyroid hormone in EDTA blood kept at room temperature for 48 h. Ann Clin Biochem 2001;38: 561-563. [Pubmed]
[39]
39.- Glendenning P, Leonie LA , Hayley K et al. Parathyroid hormone is mor stable in EDTA plasma than in serum. Clinical Chemistry 2002;48: 766-767. [Pubmed]
[40]
40.- Teal TK, Reed M, Stevens PE and Lamb EJ. Stability of parathyroid hormone ex vivo in haemodialysis patients. Ann Clin Biochem 2003;40: 191-193. [Pubmed]
[41]
41.- English E, McFarlane I, Taylor KP and Halsall DJ. The effect of potassium EDTA on the stability of parathyroid hormone in whole blood. Ann Clin Biochem 2007;44:297-299. [Pubmed]
[42]
42.- Cavalier E, Delanaye P, Carlisi A et al. Stability of intact parathyroid hormone in samples from haemodialysis patients. Kidney International 2007; 72: 370-372. [Pubmed]
[43]
43.- Wood PJ. The measurement of parathyroid hormone. Ann Clin Biochem 1992; 29:11-21. [Pubmed]
[44]
44.- Russell D and Henley R. The stability of parathyroid hormone in blood and serum samples at 4ºC and at room temperature. Ann Clin Biochem 1995;32:216-217. [Pubmed]
[45]
45.- Newman PJ and Ashby JP. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a two-site immunoradiometric assay for intact PTH. Ann Clin Biochem 1988;25: 654-60. [Pubmed]
Idiomas
Nefrología (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?