Journal Information
Vol. 32. Issue. 3.May 2012
Pages 275-418
Full text access
C4d as a diagnostic tool in membranous nephropathy
C4d como herramienta diagnóstica en la nefropatía membranosa
Visits
15694
Mario Espinosa-Hernándeza, Rosa Ortega-Salasb, María López-Andreua, José M. Gómez-Carrascoa, M. José Pérez-Sáeza, Carlos Pérez-Seoaneb, Pedro Aljama-Garcíaa
a Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba,
b Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba,
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (5)
Show moreShow less

Introducción: La nefropatía membranosa (NM) es la causa más frecuente de síndrome nefrótico en adultos. El diagnóstico se basa en los hallazgos típicos observados con el microscopio electrónico (ME) y el estudio de inmunofluorescencia (IF). En algunas ocasiones, sólo se dispone de tejido para estudio de microscopio óptico (MO); en estos casos puede ser complicado diferenciar entre una NM y una enfermedad por cambios mínimos (ECM). Recientemente se está extendiendo el estudio con C4d por inmunohistoquímica. Existe muy poca información sobre el depósito de C4d en la NM. Nuestro estudio consistió en analizar si el depósito de C4d realizado en la muestra en parafina podría ser útil en el diagnóstico de NM. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a todos los pacientes diagnosticados de NM mediante biopsia renal en nuestra unidad entre enero de 2001 y octubre de 2008. Se incluyeron sólo adultos con un diagnóstico certero de NM y ECM idiopática que dispusieran de estudios con MO, IF y ME. En octubre de 2008, secciones de 3 µm de tejido renal fijado en formaldehído fueron deparafinadas y rehidratadas. Después se tiñeron mediante inmunohistoquímica con C4d usando un anticuerpo policlonal antihumano obtenido de conejo. Resultados: Se incluyeron finalmente 19 pacientes con ECM y 21 con NM. Ningún depósito de C4d fue observado en ninguno de los glomérulos de los pacientes con ECM y el 100% de estos pacientes fueron clasificados como negativos. Sin embargo, el depósito de C4d se detectó en el 100% de los pacientes con NM y en todos los glomérulos con una distribución uniforme y granular dibujando todas las asas capilares. Conclusiones: El depósito de C4d mediante inmunohistoquímica es una herramienta muy útil en el diagnóstico de NM.

Palabras clave:
C4d
Palabras clave:
Complemento
Palabras clave:
Nefropatía membranosa

Introduction: membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The diagnosis is based on typical findings observed using electron microscope (EM) and immunofluorescence (IF) studies. On some occasions, tissues are only available for analysis using an optical microscope (OM); in these cases, it can be difficult to differentiate between MN and minimal change disease (MCD). Recently, the use of C4d immunohistochemical staining has spread. Very little information is available regarding C4d deposits in MN. Our study consisted of analysing whether C4d staining of samples embedded in paraffin could be useful for diagnosing MN. Material and Method: Ours was a retrospective study including all patients diagnosed with MN by renal biopsy in our unit between January 2001 and October 2008. We only included adult patients with a definitive diagnosis of MN or idiopathic MCD by OM, IF, and ME studies. In October 2008, 3µm sections of renal tissue fixed in formaldehyde were removed from paraffin and rehydrated. The samples were then stained for C4d immunohistochemical analysis using anti-human polyclonal antibodies obtained from rabbits. Results: Our study included a final sample of 19 patients with MCD and 21 with MN. No C4d deposits were observed in any of the glomeruli in patients with MCD, and 100% of these patients were classified as negative. However, C4d deposits were detected in 100% of patients with MN, and were observable in all glomeruli with a uniform granular distribution, demarcating all capillary loops. Conclusions: C4d immunohistochemical staining is a very useful tool for diagnosing MN.

Keywords:
C4d
Keywords:
Complement
Keywords:
Membranous nephropathy
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

 

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults.1 The diagnosis is based on typical findings observed using electron microscope (EM) and immunofluorescence (IF) studies. On some occasions, tissues are only available for analysis using an optical microscope (OM); in these cases, it can be difficult and at times impossible to differentiate between MN and minimal change disease (MCD). In these cases, it would be highly useful to have a diagnostic technique that could be performed on paraffin-fixed renal tissue.

The use of immunohistochemistry to detect the C4d complement degradation product in kidney disease has sparked considerable clinical interest recently. Studies have focused on transplant biopsies as an indicator of acute humoral rejection.2 Very little information is available on glomerular nephropathy. We have recently demonstrated that mesangial C4d deposition can be used as a bad prognostic factor in IgA nephropathy.3

C4d is a fragment of C4 generated during activation of the classical complement or lectin pathways. This fragment is highly stable, binds covalently to cell surfaces, and can be detected using reagents that are currently available.

MN pathogenesis is mediated by the in situ formation of immune deposits, with the resulting activation of the complement. Therefore, we can expect to find C4d deposits as a marker of complement activation in MN but not in MCD.

The aim of our study was to determine if C4d detection by immunohistochemical staining in MN patients could be a useful diagnostic tool.

 

MATERIAL AND METHOD

 

The study included all consecutive patients who underwent renal biopsies in our hospital between January 2001 and October 2008. The study was approved by the hospital’s Ethics and Research Committee. Patient information was processed in accordance with personal data protection regulations. Only adult patients with a diagnosis of MCN and idiopathic MN based on the histological analysis of the renal biopsy with OM, IF and EM studies were considered for inclusion in the study. For OM assessment, 2µm histological slices prepared from formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Schiff's periodic acid and methenamine silver. The IF study was performed with anti-IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, C1q, κ light chain, λ light chain antibodies, fibrinogen and albumin. The EM study was performed on glutaraldehyde-fixed renal tissue which was processed for ultrastructural analysis in line with standard laboratory protocols. The histological classification system proposed by Ehrenreich et al4 was used in MN. Five patients were in stage I, 15 in stage II and 1 patient in stage III.

Thirteen patients were excluded as glomeruli were not obtained for the C4d study. In the end, 19 patients with MCD and 21 patients with MN who met the criteria for inclusion were included in the study.

 

C4D IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING IN PARAFFIN-FIXED TISSUE

 

All renal biopsies were routinely processed for OM, IF and EM when they were taken, between January 2001 and October 2008. In October 2008, 3µm formaldehyde-fixed sections underwent immunohistochemical staining using anti-human C4d polyclonal antibodies from rabbits (Biomedica, Vienna, Austria).

All the patients’ histological sections were reviewed without clinical or pathology information. The details of these procedures were published previously.3 Patients were classified as positive when more than 75% of the glomeruli were C4d-positive and as negative when less than 25% of the glomeruli were C4d-positive.

C4d was also analysed by IF with monoclonal antibodies (Biogenesis, Vitro SA, Seville, Spain) in 2 MCD patients and 5 MN patients diagnosed after October 2008. 

 

RESULTS

 

The Table shows the age, sex, serum creatinine and proteinuria of patients diagnosed with MCD and MN before October 2008 at the time of the biopsy. No C4d deposits were observed in any of the glomeruli in patients with MCD and 100% of these patients (n=19) were classified as negative. However, C4d was detected in 100% of patients (n=21) with MN (and in 100% of the glomeruli) (Figure 1) in the form of deposits with uniform granular distribution outlining all the capillary loops (Figure 2 and Figure 3). No mesangial deposits were found.

The C4d study by IF with monoclonal antibodies was conducted on another 5 patients diagnosed with MN after October 2008. All patients tested positive for C4d (Figure 4) in both the IF study and the immunohistochemical staining.

Figure 4 shows the hematoxylin and eosin staining study (A and B), the IF studies with anti-IgG (C and D), the IF study with anti-C4d (monoclonal) (E and F), the immunohistochemical staining with anti-C4d antibodies (polyclonal) (G and H) and the EM studies in two representative patients with MCD (B, D, F, H and J) and MN (A, C, E, G and I).

 

DISCUSSION

 

Complement deposition (detected by IF, immunohistochemical staining, or EM) is a common characteristic of certain forms of glomerulonephritis (membranoproliferative, post-streptococcal, IgA nephropathy, MN, lupus nephritis and some forms of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis), and it is generally associated with antibody deposition.5-7 These complement deposits often contain both C4 and C3 and are characteristics of the classical pathway of complement activation. Sometimes, they only contain C3 or lack the first components, indicative of complement activation through the alternative pathway.

C4d is the breakdown product of C4, which is activated and degrades as part of the classical pathway of component activation, which is usually mediated by antibodies. This is more useful and applicable to this disease now as the antibody responsible for more than 50%-70% of these cases has been recently identified, an antibody targeted at M-type phospholipase A2 receptor.8 C4d can also be generated when the complement system is activated through the lectin pathway. Once generated, C4d binds covalently to tissue components at the activation site and is, therefore, a biomarker of classical or lectin pathway activation. C4d deposition in the capillaries of the renal graft was first described in 1993 by Feucht et al.2 More recently, the detection of C4d in the peritubular capillaries by immunohistochemical staining has been recognised as a sensitive index of antibody-mediated rejection.9,10

Very few studies have analysed C4d deposition in glomerular diseases. Glomerular C4d deposition is expected to be found in lupus nephritis and it is believed to be the result of the immune complex mediated activation of the classical complement pathway.11,12 In IgA nephropathy, Roos et al13 showed that renal histology is more severe when the lectin pathway is activated (and there are C4d deposits in the mesangium). Subsequently, our group demonstrated that mesangial deposition of C4d can be used as a prognostic factor in patients with IgA nephropathy.3 Renal survival after 10 years stood 43.9% in C4d-positive patients compared with 90.9% in C4d-negative patients (P=.005), which suggests that a different type of complement activation (classical pathway or lectin pathway) plays and important pathogenic role. In idiopathic MN, unlike MN secondary to lupus, there is no C1q deposition. In these cases, the presence of C4d is probably an indicator that the complement is being activated through the lectin pathway.

Information on the role played by C4d in MN is limited to one study published in 1989. In this study,14 IF was used to test for C4d in 12 patients with idiopathic MN and was detected in 11 of these patients.

C4d immunohistochemical staining using the immunoperoxidase technique described in our study has the major advantage of being performed on paraffin-embedded tissue so those cases in which there is no tissue available for IF or EM study can be diagnosed. Suzuki et al15 showed that C4d immunohistochemical staining was comparable to IF detection. Our data obtained from 5 patients coincides with this idea.

The site where the C4d is deposited is also worth mentioning. In IgA nephropathy, C4d staining was mainly observed in the mesangium, indicating the probable site where the local complement was activated.3,13 In this study on MN patients, C4d deposits were located in the capillary loops of the mesangium and with a granular distribution. MN is characterised by an accumulation of immune deposits on the outer surface of the glomerular basement membrane, which causes the membrane to thicken. These immune deposits have been identified as IgG, often IgG4,16,17 and the membrane attack complex of complement C5b-9.18 We believe that C4d forms part of these immune deposits. Furthermore, it has been suggested that complement activation plays no role in MCD pathogenesis. Our study provides support for both of these theories. C4d deposition was observed in the glomerular basement membrane of 100% of MN patients while the results were negative in 100% of the cases with MCD.

In summary, our data suggest that C4d immunohistochemical staining is a highly useful tool for the differential diagnosis of MN and MCD in adults. This finding is particularly significant as the diagnosis can be performed even if we only have tissue for OM available.

 

Conflicts of interest

 

The authors affirm that they have no conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.

Table 1. Clinical and analytical data at the time of renal biopsy

Figure 1. Immunohistochemical study with anti-C4d antibodies of a patient with membranous nephropathy (x10)

Figure 2. Immunohistochemical study with anti-C4d antibodies of a patient with membranous nephropathy (x40)

Figure 3. Immunohistochemical study with anti-C4d antibodies of a patient with membranous nephropathy (x100)

Figure 4. Hematoxylin and eosin studies, immunofluorescence with anti-IgG and anti-C4d antibodies (monoclonal), immunohistochemistry with anti-C4d (polyclonal) and electron microscope studies in two patients with minimum change disease and nephropathy

Bibliography
[1]
Glassock RJ. Diagnosis and natural course of membranous nephropathy. Semin Nephrol 2003;23:324-32. [Pubmed]
[2]
Feucht HE, Schneeberger H, Hillebrand G, Burkhardt K, Weiss M, Riethmuller G, et al. Capillary deposition of C4d complement fragment and early renal graft loss. Kidney Int 1993;43:1333-8. [Pubmed]
[3]
Espinosa M, Ortega R, Gómez-Carrasco JM, López-Rubio F, López-Andreu M, López-Oliva MO, et al. Mesangial C4d deposition: a new prognostic factor in IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:886-91. [Pubmed]
[4]
Ehrenreich T, Porush JG, Churg J, Garfinkel L, Glabman S, Goldstein MH, et al. Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med 1976;295:741-6. [Pubmed]
[5]
Quigg RJ. Complement and the kidney. J Immunol 2003;171:3319-24. [Pubmed]
[6]
West CD. The complement profile in clinical medicine: Inherited and acquired conditions lowering the serum concentrations of complement component and control proteins. Complement Inflamm 1989;6:49-64. [Pubmed]
[7]
Inal JM, Pascual M, Lesavre P, Schifferli JA. Complement inhibition in renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:237-40. [Pubmed]
[8]
Beck L, Bonegio R, Lambeau G, Beck D, Powell D, Cummins T, et al. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2009;361:11-2.
[9]
Herzenberg AM, Gill J, Djurdjev O, Magil A. C4d deposition in acute rejection: an independent long-term prognostic factor. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:234-41. [Pubmed]
[10]
Bohmig GA, Exner M, Habicht A, Schillinger M, Lang U, Kletzmayr J, et al. Capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts: a specific marker of alloantibody dependent graft injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:1091-9. [Pubmed]
[11]
Kim SH, Jeon HJ. Glomerular C4d deposition indicates in situ classic complement pathway activation but is not marker for Lupus Nephritis activity. Yonsei Med J 2003;44:75-80. [Pubmed]
[12]
Zwirner J, Felber E, Herzog V, Riethmüller G, Feucht HE. Classical pathway of complement activation in normal and diseased human glomeruli. Kidney Int 1989;36:1069-77. [Pubmed]
[13]
Roos A, Rastaldi MP, Calvaresi N, Oortwijn B, Schlagwein N, van Gijlswijk-Janssen D, et al. Glomerular activation of the lectin pathway of complement in IgA nephropathy is associated with more severe renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:1724-34. [Pubmed]
[14]
Kusunoki Y, Itami N, Tochimaru H, Takekoshi Y, Nagasawa S, Yoshiki T. Glomerular deposition of C4 cleavage fragment (C4d) and C4-binding protein in idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis. Nephron 1989;51(1):17-9. [Pubmed]
[15]
Suzuki T, Horita S, Kadoya K, Mitsuiki K, Aita K, Harada A, et al. Immunohistochemistry in glomerulonephritis with different antibodies. Clin Exp Nephrol 2007;11:287-91. [Pubmed]
[16]
Imai H, Hamai K, Komatsuda A, Ohtani H, Miura AB. IgG subclasses in patients with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, membranous nephropathy, and lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 1997;51:270-6. [Pubmed]
[17]
Noel LH, Aucouturier P, Monteiro RC, Preud¿Homme JL, Lesavre P. Glomerular and serum immunoglobulin G subclases in membranous nephropathy and anti-glomerular basement membrane nephritis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1988;46:186-94. [Pubmed]
[18]
Adler S, Baker PJ, Pritzl P, Couser WG. Detection of terminal complement components in experimental immune glomerular injury. Kidney Int 1984;26:830-7. [Pubmed]
Download PDF
Idiomas
Nefrología (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?