Journal Information
Vol. 44. Issue. 5.September - October 2024
Pages 615-768
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
5
Vol. 44. Issue. 5.September - October 2024
Pages 615-768
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Gender distribution among editorial boards and authors of nephrology and urology journals
Distribución por sexos entre los consejos editoriales y los autores de las revistas de nefrología y urología
Visits
5
Michael Haidingera,
Corresponding author
haidinger@hin.ch

Corresponding author.
, Svenja Raviolib, Gregor Lindnerc,d
a Department of Internal Medicine, Spital Bülach, Bülach, Switzerland
b Department of Emergency Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
c Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
d Department of Emergency Medicine, Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Clarivate Journal Citation Report-ranked top 30 journals in the category urology and nephrology.
Full Text
Dear Editor,

Diversity and equality receive increasing attention in the healthcare sector. Relevant discrepancies in gender equality were described in various studies: women were underrepresented in boards of national societies in emergency and intensive care medicine.1,2 In addition, women were outnumbered by men on the editorial boards of academic medical journals, and a significant gender gap was also found among speakers at international medical conferences.3,4 In nephrology, women were found to be underrepresented among presidents and board members of European nephrology societies.5 In Spain, too, there are still far fewer women in management positions in nephrology and scientific research.6 However, their representation was still higher compared to several other medical societies.5 There have been partially successful efforts to increase the proportion of women in the field of nephrology, e.g. in awards of international nephrological societies and in high-ranking US nephrological journals.7,8 Currently, there are no data on the gender distribution in editorial boards and hardly any on authorships of nephrology journals.

In a cross-sectional analysis, the gender of the editorial board members and editors-in-chief of the 30 top-ranked journals in the “Urology and Nephrology” category of the Clarivate Analytics Journal Citation Reports for 2021 was analyzed. All journals ranked in the first quarter (30/120) of the Clarivate JCR were included in the analysis. These included 14 journals with a focus on nephrology and 14 journals on urology. One journal deals with both disciplines and one with nutrition, which is listed in a separate category labeled “Other” (Table 1). In the second part of the study, the gender distribution among the first and last authors of the 10 top-ranked journals was analyzed.

Table 1.

Clarivate Journal Citation Report-ranked top 30 journals in the category urology and nephrology.

Category  Journal  Ranking 
UrologyEuropean Urology 
Nature Review Urology 
European Urology Oncology 
Journal of Urology  10 
European Urology Supplements  11 
European Urology Focus  12 
Aging Male  14 
BJU International  15 
Prostata Cancer and Prostata Disease  16 
World Journal of Men's Health  17 
Sexual Medicine Reviews  19 
World Journal of Urology  21 
Prostate  23 
Journal of Sexual Medicine  25 
NephrologyNature Reviews Nephrology 
Kidney International 
Kidney International Supplements 
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 
American Journal of Kidney Disease 
CJASN 
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation  13 
Seminars in Nephrology  18 
Clinical Kidney Journal  20 
Kidney International Reports  22 
Journal of Nephrology  24 
American Journal of Nephrology  26 
Pediatric Nephrology  28 
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice  29 
OtherMinerva Urologica E Nefrologica  27 
Journal of Renal Nutrition  30 

In the analysis of editors-in-chief and editorial board members, a total of 2669 persons were included of which 625 (23%) were women. In nephrology journals, 392 women (28%) were registered while 192 (18%) for urology journals respectively. Of all analyzed editorial board members, 35 were editors-in-chief, of which seven (20%) were women. In nephrology journals, five out of 16 (31%) editors-in-chief were women and in urology journals, only one of 16 (6%) was a woman. In the category “other”, one out of three (33%) editors-in-chief was a woman. The proportion of women in editorial boards was 28% in nephrology and 18% in urology journals (Fig. 1a). When comparing the top 10% of journals with the next 15%, the proportion of women as editors-in-chief was higher in the top journals, but did not reach significance (p=0.22). In contrast, the proportion of women on editorial boards was significantly higher in the top 10% of journals (p<0.01).

Fig. 1.

(a) Gender distribution in editorial boards of top-ranked journals in urology and nephrology. (b) Gender distribution in first and last authors of urology and nephrology journals ranked in the top 10%.

(0.2MB).

In the analysis of gender distribution in authorships in urology and nephrology journals, totally 2817 first authors were identified, of which 909 (32%) were women. The proportion of women first authors was significantly higher in nephrology compared to urology journals (p<0.01). The analysis of last authors included 2347 authors, of which 486 (21%) were women (Fig. 1b). We found no difference in the proportion of first and last authors between U.S. and non-U.S. journals. There was no significant correlation between the proportion of women first (correlation coefficient 0.53, p=0.12) and senior authors (correlation coefficient 0.12, p=0.74) and impact factor of the respective journal (data not shown).

In summary, women are underrepresented on the editorial boards and among the authors of nephrology journals. Compared to urology, however, the proportion of women on editorial boards and as authors in nephrology journals was twice as high. Previous studies have already shown this distribution for the specialty of urology.9 Our result could be due to the higher proportion of women in nephrology compared to the more surgically oriented specialty of urology. Nevertheless, the relatively higher proportion of women authors suggests a more balanced future generation of researchers. These findings are consistent with a number of recent publications from various medical fields that have seen an increase in female authors.6,10 Internationally, and also in Spain, more women than men graduate from medical school resulting in a predominance of female in the public healthcare workforce. The proportion of female nephrologists in Spain remains roughly the same since 2007 at just over 43%. However, the proportion of women at career levels and in the academic environment is falling continuously.6 The reasons for the unequal distribution between the sexes are manifold and include the compatibility of career and family, the lack of targeted career programs for women and political/social will. In addition to private and professional obligations, these points in particular make it difficult to expand the professional focus to academic nephrology.9 Measures are needed to ensure equal opportunities for researchers of all genders in academic medicine. Enabling part-time work, childcare, more diverse role models and promoting a culture of openness and diversity are welcome in order to achieve these goals.

Authors’ contributions

MH and GL planned the study and conducted the study design. MH, SR and GL were involved in data collection, statistical analysis and performed the manuscript draft (original draft). All authors critically revised the manuscript draft writing (review and editing).

Funding

None declared.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

References
[1]
G. Lindner, A. Rupp, A.K. Exadaktylos, S. Ravioli.
Gender distribution in board memberships of emergency medicine societies.
Am J Emerg Med, 47 (2021), pp. 176-179
[2]
S. Ravioli, N. Moser, B. Ryser, C.A. Pfortmueller, G. Lindner.
Gender distribution in boards of intensive care medicine societies.
J Crit Care, 68 (2022), pp. 157-162
[3]
S. Ravioli, A. Rupp, A.K. Exadaktylos, G. Lindner.
Gender distribution in emergency medicine journals: editorial board memberships in top-ranked academic journals.
Eur J Emerg Med, 28 (2021), pp. 380-385
[4]
B. Ryser, A. Rudenko, M. Haidinger, A.K. Exadaktylos, S. Ravioli, G. Lindner.
Gender distribution in speakers at emergency medicine conferences.
Am J Emerg Med, 53 (2022), pp. 161-162
[5]
S. Ravioli, G. Lindner, M. Haidinger.
Gender distribution in presidents and board members of European nephrology societies.
Clin Kidney J, 15 (2021), pp. 1017-1018
[6]
M.A. Martín-Gómez, R. García Agudo, M.D. Arenas Jiménez.
The role of women throughout the history of Nephrology.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed), 39 (2019), pp. 15-17
[7]
M. Haidinger, S. Ravioli, G. Lindner.
Equality in recipients of nephrology awards from international societies.
Kidney Med, 4 (2022), pp. 100505
[8]
Abraham RR, Adisa O, Owen ME, et al. Evaluation of gender trends in first authorship in nephrology publications in four major US journals in the last decade. J Nephrol. 2023;36:1395-1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01557-w
[9]
M. Prunty, S. Rhodes, H. Sun, A. Miller, A. Calaway, A. Kutikov, et al.
A Seat at the Table: The Correlation Between Female Authorship and Urology Journal Editorial Board Membership.
Eur Urol Focus., 8 (2022), pp. 1751-1757
[10]
C. Santucci, B.G. López-Valcarcel, C. Avendaño-Solá, M.C. Bautista, C.G. Pino, L.L. García, et al.
Gender inequity in the medical profession: the women doctors in Spain (WOMEDS) study.
Hum Resour Health, 21 (2023), pp. 77
Copyright © 2024. Sociedad Española de Nefrología
Download PDF
Idiomas
Nefrología (English Edition)
Article options
Tools