Journal Information
Vol. 38. Issue. 2.March - April 2018
Pages 109-246
Visits
3720
Vol. 38. Issue. 2.March - April 2018
Pages 109-246
Editorial
DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2017.11.016
Open Access
Beyond the traditional lipid parameters in chronic kidney disease
Más allá de los parámetros lipídicos tradicionales en la enfermedad renal crónica
Visits
3720
Marcelino Bermúdez-Lópeza,
Corresponding author
mbermudez@irblleida.cat

Corresponding author.
, Àngels Betriua, Jose M. Valdivielsoa, Teresa Bretones del Pinob, David Arroyoa,1, Elvira Fernándeza,1
a Vascular and Renal Translational Research Group, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
b Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
This item has received
3720
Visits

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Full Text

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients remain unacceptably high, as evidenced by large epidemiological studies and registries of renal patients from the Spanish autonomous communities and world-wide.1

Both etiology and clinical manifestations have differential aspects compared to the general population. CKD patients have accelerated atheromatosis and ischemic events from early stages of the disease. However, contrary to the general population, the implications of lipid alterations are controversial.

First, the lipids of patients with CKD show a different profile from the dyslipidemia of the general population, and it varies with the severity of renal dysfunction. In CKD, lipid abnormalities are characterized by hypertriglyceridemia, variable levels of LDL-cholesterol and low levels of HDL-cholesterol. In early CKD stages, there are high levels of LDL-cholesterol, but in more advanced stages this parameter is normalized or even reduced.2 The National Observatory of Atherosclerosis in Nephrology (the NEFRONA Study)3,4 observed a progressive decrease of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol that are proportional to the stage of renal disease. (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Traditional lipid parameters in CKD.

Data obtained from the NEFRONA study.5 Values are expressed as mean±standard error.

(0.24MB).

Second, renal patients have a higher burden of atheromatosis than the general population, and it increases with the severity of renal dysfunction.5 In addition, they show a more rapid progression of atherosclerosis, particularly in advanced CKD stages.6a Atheromatosis is not only a predictor of vascular events, it is a vascular disease in itself, and as recently stated by the European Society of Atherosclerosis, LDL-cholesterol is an ethiological factor. In fact, high LDL-cholesterol is a condition necessary for the development of a sequence of events leading to the formation of the atherosclerotic plaque, whose growth or rupture is the final trigger of the vascular event itself.6b

Third, studies on therapeutic interventions increased the controversy. Statins, lipid-lowering drugs with highly demonstrated effectiveness in the general population, appeared to be less effective in patients with CKD. The well known studies 4D7 and AURORA8 failed to demonstrate the effectiveness of statins in dialysis patients. In addition, the SHARP study reinforced this idea, although it showed that in non-dialysis CKD patients, statins did reduce vascular risk. Hofwever, this reduction decreased as renal function declines.9 It is important to bear in mind when analysing these results that the above studies have some specific circumstances and limitations. Nonetheless, their results and conclusions have been reproduced many times, and have been strengthened by the publication of multiple meta-analyzes 10–13

In addition, a debate has been generated by the latest American guidelines of vascular risk, which were also supported by the 2013 KDIGO guidelines on the management of dyslipidemia in CKD. In both guidelines, a paradigm change was promulgated in the management of lipid disorders and the prevention of vascular events. They encourage the use of pharmacological treatment based on the patient's risk profile and omitting LDL-cholesterol values. The guidelines are summarized in the following points. First, it is recommended to study the lipid profile of all patients with CKD of any stage. Most do not require follow-up controls. Second, it is recommended to initiate statin or statin / ezetimibe in CKD patients over 50 years of age not on dialysis. Third, in patients under 50 years of age not on dialysis and renal transplants of any age, it is suggested to treat only if they have a history of cardio or cerebrovascular event, diabetes or an estimated 10-year risk of cardiovascular event greater than 10%. In both cases, the indication for treatment is not guided by LDL-cholesterol level, and dislipemia follow-ups are not recommended. Finally, in patients on dialysis, it is not suggested to initiate lipid-lowering treatment.14

These recommendations were received with unequal reactions, especially the one that refers to no need for follow-up lab measurements, an strategy of “shoot and forget”. This is similar to what was suggested months before by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association for the general population.15 This disturbing change was soon rejected by many European scientific societies as well as by many American experts. However, having no intention to make an analysis in detail of these statements, they reflect a gap between physicians who are faced with risk management and vascular prevention.

The latest European guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association of Atheromatosis of 2016 classify patients with CKD as subjects with moderate vascular risk (if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is 30–59mL/min/1.73m2) or severe (if the eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m2).16 This classification has therapeutic implications since it sets the target LDL-cholesterol levels in 100 or 70mg/dL, respectively.

All this controversies have generated different ideas and heterogeneity in clinical practice in relation to the diagnosis, treatment and the assessment of the contribution of dislipemia to the cardiovascular morbidity in these patients.

Historically, the lipid parameters measured in clinical practice were: total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. However, in recent years the limited contribution of these parameters in the renal population has become evident (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Traditional and non-traditional lipid parameters.

The traditional lipid parameters are based on total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. However, non-traditional parameters such as the lipidoma, particle size and number of particles along with lipoprotein(a) and PCSK9 levels would provide more accurate information about the vascular risk of CKD patients.

(0.23MB).

In CKD patients, the nearly normal or low levels of LDL-cholesterol do not explain the fast progression and elevated atheromatous burden6a,17, and the considerable residual risk.13

Nowadays, there are new approaches to analyze the different subpopulations of lipoproteins; among many options, the most common are: gel electrophoresis, density gradient ultracentrifugation and nuclear magnetic resonance.18 Briefly, each method determines different physicochemical parameters of lipoproteins such as size, electrical charge, cholesterol concentration or the magnetic resonance to assess the lipoprotein subclass distribution.19

Based on the current knowledge, we propose a new approach to the management of lipid abnormalities in CKD patients; the idea is to identify specific therapeutic targets in this population. It is fundamental for clinicians to know what is measured in a routine lipid profile. The parameter “LDL-cholesterol” or “HDL-cholesterol” reflects the concentration of cholesterol transported in molecules called LDL or HDL, respectively. However, cholesterol may be transported in a variable number of LDL or HDL particles, thus the load of cholesterol per particle would not be the same. Therefore, it makes sense, to measure the concentration of LDL and HDL particles (LDL-P and HDL-P); individuals with the same LDL-cholesterol may have different vascular risk if they have different particle concentration. The individual with higher LDL-P has higher cardiovascular risk.20 Conversely, a high HDL-P correlates with a reduced vascular risk.21 The size of the particle is relevant. Multiple studies have shown that small LDL particles are more atherogenic than large ones since they have an increased ability to penetrate the vascular wall.22 Similarly, small HDL particles also correlate with a higher vascular risk due to a decreased anti-atherogenic effect.23 Renal patients have an accumulation of small LDL particles that are associated with a higher rate of cardiovascular events.24,25 Interestingly, they show a decrease in small pro-atherogenic HDL particles.26 Paradoxically, these parameters of considerable clinical relevance are currently not determined in daily clinical practice although their use in research is becoming widespread.

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] is one parameter easy to obtain from the clinical Lab. It has been demonstrated that the levels of Lp(a) increase as kidney disease progresses27 and decline after kidney transplantation.28 An in vivo study showed a decrease in the clearance of Lp(a) in hemodialysis patients, demonstrating the involvement of the kidney in its elimination.29 Unlike patients on hemodialysis, patients with nephrotic syndrome have an increased hepatic synthesis of Lp(a) resulting in an elevation of plasma levels.30 Lp(a) has a marked proatherogenic effect.31 Lp(a) predicts the development of carotid atheromatous disease32,33 and vascular events in dialysis patients.34 However, the determination of Lp(a) is not widespread, which can be explained by the absence of drugs capable to modify Lp(a) levels.

Historically, available drugs only aimed to modify the concentration of LDL-cholesterol. There were no treatments with a significant effect on other lipid parameters (aside from apheresis). On the other hand, PCSK9 inhibitors offer a new therapeutic approach. They have the ability to reduce of LDL cholesterol levels and the risk of vascular events.35 Moreover, they also reduce the plasma concentration of Lp(a).36 It should be emphasized that these new drugs exert an impact on the size of the particles. They reduce the total concentration of LDL particles and also cause a reduction of large and small LDL particles. Surprisingly, they increase the number of HDL particles, especially the larger ones.37 Unfortunately, in Nephrology, we do not have specific studies that evaluate the impact of these treatments in patients with CKD. A priori, given their beneficial effect on parameters altered in CKD, it is easy to expect positive results. Based on that, the nephrology community need to design clinical trials in such population.

Meanwhile, it is urgent to gain further information about specific lipid abnormalities in renal patients. Besides the quantitative changes described above, CKD is characterized by qualitative changes caused by a highly inflammatory and pro-oxidative state.38 New research tools, such as metabolomics and lipidomics, are useful to investigate lipid abnormalities in CKD patients. There are reasons to believe that during the next coming years, we will witness a resurgence of the field of dyslipidemia in Nephrology, with new perspectives and more effective tools.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all members of the Vascular and Renal Translational Research Group in the IRBLleida, Spain

References
[1]
C.A. Herzog, R.W. Asinger, A.K. Berger, D.M. Charytan, J. Díez, R.G. Hart, et al.
Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. A clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).
Kidney Int, 80 (2011), pp. 572-586
[2]
B.C. Kwan, F. Kronenberg, S. Beddhu, A.K. Cheung.
Lipoprotein metabolism and lipid management in chronic kidney disease.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 18 (2007), pp. 1246-1261
[3]
M. Junyent, M. Martínez, M. Borràs, B. Coll, J.M. Valdivielso, T. Vidal, et al.
Predicting cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease in Spain. The rationale and design of NEFRONA: a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study.
[4]
M. Junyent, M. Martínez, M. Borrás, A. Bertriu, B. Coll, L. Craver, et al.
Usefulness of imaging techniques and novel biomarkers in the prediction of cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease in Spain: the NEFRONA project.
[5]
D. Arroyo, A. Betriu, M. Martinez-Alonso, T. Vidal, J.M. Valdivielso, E. Fernández, et al.
Observational multicenter study to evaluate the prevalence and prognosis of subclinical atheromatosis in a Spanish chronic kidney disease cohort: baseline data from the NEFRONA study.
[7]
C. Wanner, V. Krane, W. März, M. Olschewski, J.F. Mann, G. Ruf, German Diabetes and Dialysis Study Investigators, et al.
Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis.
N Engl J Med, 353 (2005), pp. 238-248
[8]
B.C. Fellström, A.G. Jardine, R.E. Schmieder, H. Holdaas, K. Bannister, J. Beutler, et al.
Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
N Engl J Med, 360 (2009), pp. 1395-1407
[9]
C. Baigent, M.J. Landray, C. Reith, J. Emberson, D.C. Wheeler, C. Tomson, et al.
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Lancet, 377 (2011), pp. 2181-2192
[10]
X. Su, L. Zhang, J. Lv, J. Wang, W. Hou, X. Xie, et al.
Effect of statins on kidney disease outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Am J Kidney Dis, 67 (2016), pp. 881-892
[11]
Z. Zhang, P. Wu, J. Zhang, S. Wang, G. Zhang.
The effect of statins on microalbuminuria, proteinuria, progression of kidney function, and all-cause mortality in patients with non-end stage chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.
Pharmacol Res, 105 (2016), pp. 74-83
[12]
A. Sanguankeo, S. Upala, W. Cheungpasitporn, P. Ungprasert, E.L. Knight.
Effects of statins on renal outcome in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One, 10 (2015), pp. e0132970
[13]
M. Barylski, S. Nikfar, D.P. Mikhailidis, P.P. Toth, P. Salari, K.K. Ray, Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration Group, et al.
Statins decrease all-cause mortality only in CKD patients not requiring dialysis therapy — a meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 21,295 participants.
Pharmacol Res, 72 (2013), pp. 35-44
[14]
C. Wanner, M. Tonelli, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Lipid Guideline Development Work Group Members.
KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Lipid Management in CKD: summary of recommendation statements and clinical approach to the patient.
Kidney Int, 85 (2014), pp. 1303-1309
[15]
N.J. Stone, J.G. Robinson, A.H. Lichtenstein, C.N. Bairey Merz, C.B. Blum, R.H. Eckel, et al.
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
[16]
A.L. Catapano, I. Graham, G. de Backer, O. Wiklund, M.J. Chapman, H. Drexel, et al.
2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias: The Task Force for the Management of Dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).
Atherosclerosis, 253 (2016), pp. 281-344
[17]
A. Betriu, M. Martinez-Alonso, M.V. Arcidiacono, J. Cannata-Andia, J. Pascual, J.M. Valdivielso, et al.
Prevalence of subclinical atheromatosis and associated risk factors in chronic kidney disease: the NEFRONA study.
Nephrol Dial Transplant, 29 (2014), pp. 1415-1422
[18]
J.G. Robinson.
What is the role of advanced lipoprotein analysis in practice?.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 60 (2012), pp. 2607-2615
[19]
N. Clouet-Foraison, F. Gaie-Levrel, P. Gillery, V. Delatour.
Advanced lipoprotein testing for cardiovascular diseases risk assessment: a review of the novel approaches in lipoprotein profiling.
Clin Chem Lab Med, 55 (2017), pp. 1453-1464
[20]
J.D. Otvos, S. Mora, I. Shalaurova, P. Greenland, R.H. Mackey, D.C. Goff Jr., et al.
Clinical implications of discordance between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and particle number.
J Clin Lipidol, 5 (2011), pp. 105-113
[21]
A. Kontush.
HDL particle number and size as predictors of cardiovascular disease.
Front Pharmacol, 6 (2015), pp. 218
[22]
S. Ip, A.H. Lichtenstein, M. Chung, J. Lau, E.M. Balk.
Systematic review: association of low-density lipoprotein subfractions with cardiovascular outcomes.
Ann Intern Med, 150 (2009), pp. 474-484
[23]
B.F. Asztalos, D. Collins, L.A. Cupples, S. Demissie, K.V. Horvath, H.E. Bloomfield, et al.
Value of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subpopulations in predicting recurrent cardiovascular events in the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 25 (2005), pp. 2185-2191
[24]
M. Chu, A.Y. Wang, I.H. Chan, S.H. Chui, C.W. Lam.
Serum small-dense LDL abnormalities in chronic renal disease patients.
Br J Biomed Sci, 69 (2012), pp. 99-102
[25]
H. Shen, Y. Xu, J. Lu, C. Ma, Y. Zhou, Q. Li, et al.
Small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was associated with future cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease patients.
BMC Nephrol, 17 (2016), pp. 143
[26]
H. Honda, T. Hirano, M. Ueda, S. Kojima, S. Mashiba, Y. Hayase, et al.
High-density lipoprotein subfractions and their oxidized subfraction particles in patients with chronic kidney disease.
J Atheroscler Thromb, 23 (2016), pp. 81-94
[27]
F. Kronenberg, P. König, U. Neyer, M. Auinger, A. Pribasnig, U. Lang, et al.
Multicenter study of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in patients with end-stage renal disease treated by hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 6 (1995), pp. 110-120
[28]
F. Kronenberg.
Causes and consequences of lipoprotein(a) abnormalities in kidney disease.
Clin Exp Nephrol, 18 (2014), pp. 234-237
[29]
M.E. Frischmann, F. Kronenberg, E. Trenkwalder, J.R. Schaefer, H. Schweer, B. Dieplinger, et al.
In vivo turnover study demonstrates diminished clearance of lipoprotein(a) in hemodialysis patients.
Kidney Int, 71 (2007), pp. 1036-1043
[30]
M.G. De Sain-Van Der Velden, D.J. Reijngoud, G.A. Kaysen, M.M. Gadellaa, H. Voorbij, F. Stellaard, et al.
Evidence for increased synthesis of lipoprotein(a) in the nephrotic syndrome.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 9 (1998), pp. 1474-1481
[31]
W.Y. Craig, L.M. Neveux, G.E. Palomaki, M.M. Cleveland, J.E. Haddow.
Lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for ischemic heart disease: metaanalysis of prospective studies.
Clin Chem, 44 (1998), pp. 2301-2306
[32]
F. Kronenberg, H. Kathrein, P. König, U. Neyer, W. Sturm, K. Lhotta, et al.
Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes predict the risk for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Arterioscler Thromb, 14 (1994), pp. 1405-1411
[33]
M. Koch, B. Kutkuhn, E. Trenkwalder, D. Bach, B. Grabensee, H. Dieplinger, et al.
Apolipoprotein B, fibrinogen, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes predict coronary artery disease in hemodialysis patients.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 8 (1997), pp. 1889-1898
[34]
J.C. Longenecker, M.J. Klag, S.M. Marcovina, Y.M. Liu, B.G. Jaar, N.R. Powe, et al.
High lipoprotein(a) levels and small apolipoprotein(a) size prospectively predict cardiovascular events in dialysis patients.
J Am Soc Nephrol, 16 (2005), pp. 1794-1802
[35]
M.S. Sabatine, R.P. Giugliano, A.C. Keech, N. Honarpour, S.D. Wiviott, S.A. Murphy, et al.
Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.
N Engl J Med, 376 (2017), pp. 1713-1722
[36]
G. Reyes-Soffer, M. Pavlyha, C. Ngai, T. Thomas, S. Holleran, R. Ramakrishnan, et al.
Effects of PCSK9 inhibition with alirocumab on lipoprotein metabolism in healthy humans.
Circulation, 135 (2017), pp. 352-362
[37]
M.J. Koren, D. Kereiakes, R. Pourfarzib, D. Winegar, P. Banerjee, S. Hamon, et al.
Effect of PCSK9 inhibition by alirocumab on lipoprotein particle concentrations determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
J Am Heart Assoc, 4 (2015),
[38]
P.S. Tucker, V.J. Dalbo, T. Han, M.I. Kingsley.
Clinical and research markers of oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease.
Biomarkers, 18 (2013), pp. 103-115

Please cite this article as: Bermúdez-López M, Betriu À, Valdivielso JM, Bretones del Pino T, Arroyo D, Fernández E. Más allá de los parámetros lipídicos tradicionales en la enfermedad renal crónica. Nefrologia. 2018;38:109–113.

Senior co-authorship: David Arroyo, MD, PhD, Elvira Fernández, MD, PhD.

Copyright © 2017. Sociedad Española de Nefrología
Idiomas
Nefrología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.