se ha leído el artículo
array:19 [ "pii" => "X0211699503028755" "issn" => "02116995" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2003-04-01" "documento" => "article" "licencia" => "http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Nefrologia. 2003;23 Supl 2:127-30" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2390 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 183 "HTML" => 1728 "PDF" => 479 ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:15 [ "pii" => "X0211699503028747" "issn" => "02116995" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2003-04-01" "documento" => "article" "licencia" => "http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Nefrologia. 2003;23 Supl 2:131-4" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2304 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 195 "HTML" => 1689 "PDF" => 420 ] ] "en" => array:8 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "titulo" => "Bone loss in pediatric renal transplant recipients" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "131" "paginaFinal" => "134" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "A. A. ELHUSSEINI , A. E. EL-AGROUDY , M. A. SOBH , M. A. GHONEIM" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "nombre" => "A. A. ELHUSSEINI , A. E. EL-AGROUDY , M. A. SOBH , M. A. GHONEIM" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/X0211699503028747?idApp=UINPBA000064" "url" => "/02116995/00000023000000S2/v0_201502091324/X0211699503028747/v0_201502091324/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:15 [ "pii" => "X0211699503028763" "issn" => "02116995" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2003-04-01" "documento" => "article" "licencia" => "http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Nefrologia. 2003;23 Supl 2:122-6" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2537 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 197 "HTML" => 1899 "PDF" => 441 ] ] "es" => array:8 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "titulo" => "Alteraciones del metabolismo óseo tras el trasplante renal" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "122" "paginaFinal" => "126" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "S. GARCÍA , V. LORENZO , D. HERNÁNDEZ , A. TORRES , Y. BARRIOS" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "nombre" => "S. GARCÍA , V. LORENZO , D. HERNÁNDEZ , A. TORRES , Y. BARRIOS" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/X0211699503028763?idApp=UINPBA000064" "url" => "/02116995/00000023000000S2/v0_201502091324/X0211699503028763/v0_201502091324/es/main.assets" ] "en" => array:8 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "titulo" => "Osteoporosis after renal transplantation" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "127" "paginaFinal" => "130" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "S. TRABULUS , S. APAYDIN , M. R. ALTIPARMAK , N. SEYAHI , M. SARIYAR , K. SERDENGECTI , E. EREK" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "nombre" => "S. TRABULUS , S. APAYDIN , M. R. ALTIPARMAK , N. SEYAHI , M. SARIYAR , K. SERDENGECTI , E. EREK" ] ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "NEFROLOGÍA. Vol. XXIII. Suplemento 2. 2003 Osteoporosis after renal transplantation S.Trabulus**, S. Apaydin*, M. R. Altiparmak*, N. Seyahi*, M. Sariyar***, K. Serdengeçti* y E. Erek* Istanbul University. Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty. Departments of Nephrology* and Surgery***. Istanbul. Turkey. Department of Nephrology**. SSK Istanbul Educational Hospital. Istanbul. Turkey. SUMMARY This study was performed to determine risk factors associated with osteoporosis that develops after renal transplantation. Sixty-five kidney graft recipients were included in this study. They were divided into four groups according to the time since transplantation : Group 1 ( < 1 year ; n = 26 ), group 2 (1 ­ 3 years ; n = 16), group 3 (3-5 years ; n = 12) and group 4 (> 5 years ; n = 11). These groups were matched according to probable risk factors for osteoporosis, findings of serum biochemistry, biochemical markers of bone turnover and measurements of bone mineral density. One way ANOVA test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Osteoporosis was found in 22 recipients (33.8%). There were significant differences in recipient age, cumulative steroid dose, and episodes of acute rejection between the four groups. Increasing age, cumulative steroid dose and episodes of acute rejection were found to be risk factors for osteoporosis in our study. Key words: Renal transplantation. Osteoporosis. Risk factors. OSTEOPOROSIS DESPUÉS DEL TRASPLANTE RENAL RESUMEN Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar factores de riesgo asociados a osteoporosis que se desarrolla después del trasplante renal. En este estudio se incluyeron 65 pacientes portadores de un trasplante renal. Se dividieron en 4 grupos de acuerdo al tiempo desde el trasplante: Grupo 1 ( < 1 año; n = 26), grupo 2 (1-3 años; n = 16), grupo 3 (3 a 5 años = 12) y grupo 4 (> 5 años; n = 11). Todos los grupos se ajustaron de acuerdo a probables factores de riesgo de osteoporosis, marcadores bioquímicos, marcadores de recambio óseo y densidad mineral ósea. El análisis estadístico se realizó por medio de ANOVA y mediante el test Kruskal-Wallis. Se encontró osteoporosis en un total de 22 receptores de trasplante de riñón (33,8%). La edad de recepción del trasplante, la dosis acumulada de esteroides y los episodios de rechazo agudo de trasplante renal fueron estadísticamente significativos entre los cuatro grupos. El aumento de la edad, la dosis acumulada de esteroides y los episodios de rechazo agudo fueron factores de riesgo de osteoporosis en nuestro estudio. Palabras clave: Trasplante renal. Osteoporosis. Factores de riesgo. Correspondence: Dr. Sinan Trabulus Darüssafaka ön sokak No: 13/4 34230 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey 127 S. TRABULUS y cols. INTRODUCCIÓN Osteoporosis occurs commonly after renal transplantation and contributes to post-transplant morbidity by increasing the risk of bone fractures 1. Many studies have demonstrated that bone mass is reduced in transplant patients 2-4. The bone loss is most pronounced during the first six months after renal transplantation and predominantly confined to the trabecular bone of the spine. It has been shown that during the first six months after transplantation, the spinal bone mineral density (BMD) decreases by a mean of 6.8 percent and an additional decrease of 2.6 percent occur between 6 and 18 months after transplantation 2. In kidney graft recipients, the most important cause of osteoporosis is corticosteroid treatment 5. Additionally, kidney transplant recipients are exposed to other potential factors that lead to osteoporosis after transplantation, such as renal osteodystrophy, hyperparathyroidism, heparin therapy before transplantation, and probably therapy with cyclosporin or tacrolimus after transplantation 6. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis and the independent risk factors influencing the development of osteoporosis after renal transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between january 2001 and october 2001, 65 consecutive kidney graft recipients (22 females and 43 males) who had stable allograft function (defined by serum creatinine < 2 mg/dl) were recruited in this cross-sectional study in our out-patient clinic. Postmenopausal women or those on estrogen replacement therapy and patients with secondary osteoporosis due to type I or II diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, primary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, hypogonadism, hyperprolactinemia, Cushing's syndrome, acromegaly, chronic diarrhoea and malabsorption syndromes were excluded. The following risk factors for low BMD were obtained from patient records: age, gender, smoking, existence of pre-transplant steroid therapy, hyperparathyroid bone disease, duration of chronic renal failure, time on dialysis, donor source, cumulative steroid dose, doses of steroid bolus therapy, episodes of acute rejection, osteonecrosis and persistent hyperparathyroidism. Cumulative steroid and pulse steroid doses were calculated starting from date of transplantation to the time of evaluation of BMD. At the time of the bone examination, serum creatinine, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, 128 phosphorus, creatinine clearance and intact parathyroid hormone levels were measured. The levels of daily urinary calcium and phosphorus, and tubular reabsorption of phosphate were also measured. Biochemical assessment of bone-turnover was performed by using serum bone alkaline phosphatase and serum osteocalcin as indices of bone formation, and urine deoxypyridinoline as an index of bone resorption. BMD of the first, second, third, and fourth lumbar vertebrae and left femoral neck was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA-Hologic, model QDR-4500 W). Osteoporosis was defined as T scores below 2.5 SD 7, 8. Patients were divided into four groups according to the duration of transplantation: Group 1: < 1 year; group 2: 1-3 years; group 3: 3-5 years and group 4: > 5 years. The groups were compared for the probable risk factors of osteoporosis, serum biochemistry, biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. One way ANOVA test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. P values < 0.05 were accepted as significant. RESULTS Osteoporosis was found in 22 recipients (33.8%). The prevalence of osteoporosis varied significantly during different time periods after transplantation; it was, respectively, 15.3% within the first year after transplantation, 37.5% between 1 and 3 years, and 41.6% between 3 and 5 years. Osteoporosis was observed in as many as 63.6% of patients with transplants lasting longer than five years. There were significant differences in recipient age, cumulative steroid dose, and episodes of acute graft rejection between the four groups. Patients in group 1 and 2 (the mean age 30.3 ± 8.9 and 29.1 ± 8.5, respectively) were significantly younger than those in group 4 (the mean age 42.4 ± 11) (p = 0.004 and p = 0.004, respectively). Group 4 had received the highest cumulative steroid doses. There was significant difference in episodes of acute rejection between groups 1 and 2 (3 patients versus 8 patients, respectively) (p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in the other variables between the four groups (table I). When we evaluated the bone formation and resorption markers, we found no significant difference in the mean concentrations of bone alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin and deoxypyridinoline between the groups. Levels of bone alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin were found to be higher in groups 1, 2 OSTEOPOROSIS AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION Tabla I. Comparison of four groups with respect to the probable risk factors and biochemical parameters Group 1 ( < 1 year) (n = 26) Age (Year) Female / Male Smoking Pre Tx steroid use Pre Tx bone disease Duration of CRF (month) Time on dialysis (month) Cadaveric/Living donors Cumulative steroid dose (g) Total pulse steroid dose (g) Number of recipients with acute rejection Osteonecrosis Persistent hyperparathyroidism Serum creatinine (mg/dl) Serum albumin (g/dl) Serum alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) Serum calcium (mg/dl) Serum phosphorus (mg/dl) Creatinine clearance (ml/min) IPTH (pg/ml) Daily urinary calcium (mg) Daily urinary phosphorus (mg) Tubular reabsorption of phosphate 30.3 ± 8.9 11/15 8 4 8 43.5 ± 29.5 17.8 ± 12.3 7/19 3.8 ± 2.2 2.4 ± 2.2 3 4 3 1.3 ± 0.3 4.4 ± 0.4 180 ± 101 9.9 ± 0.7 3.1 ± 0.7 49 ± 17 164 ± 132 131 ± 71 735 ± 359 0.61 ± 0.16 Group 2 (1-3 years) (n = 16) 29.1 ± 8.5 3/13 3 2 2 44.9 ± 43.7 26.1 ± 27.2 2/14 11.6 ± 6.2 4.1 ± 2.9 8 2 1 1.4 ± 0.2 4.8 ± 0.4 167 ± 74 10.1 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.6 52 ± 14 107 ± 61 116 ± 79 699 ± 281 0.64 ± 0.14 Group 3 (3-5 years) (n = 12) 35.0 ± 10.1 3/9 2 0 4 45.5 ± 41.8 27.0 ± 31.9 4/8 17.5 ± 5.0 4.5 ± 2.5 5 0 2 1.3 ± 0.4 4.6 ± 0.3 154 ± 55 9.5 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.5 48 ± 18 139 ± 61 72 ± 43 655 ± 136 0.68 ± 0.18 Group 4 (> 5 years) (n = 11) 42.4 ±11.0 5/6 1 0 0 31.3 ±26.5 16.4 ±18.9 3/8 42.5 ± 9.9 1.1 ± 0.4 4 1 0 1.1 ± 0.4 4.2 ± 0.4 122 ± 45 9.8 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.8 54 ± 13 115 ± 56 107 ± 47 491 ± 195 0.73 ± 0.20 p 0.002 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.000 NS 0.046 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS CRF: chronic renal failure, IPTH: intact parathyroid hormone, NS: nonsignificant. and 3 than in group 4; but this difference was not statistically significant. Level of deoxypyridinoline was higher in group 4 than in groups 1, 2 and 3 although this difference was not statistically significant. Also, the values of BMD and T-score were not different between the groups (table II). DISCUSSION Ostoporosis is a frequent complication after renal transplantation. Julian et al. prospectively studied renal transplant recipients receiving CsA and prednisone and showed that 18 of the 20 patients had a decrease in spinal BMD within 6 months of transplantation 2. Moreover, Grotz et al. measured BMD in 115 patients after renal transplantation. Of the patients examined, 49% displayed a significant decrease in BMD. Lowest mean values were observed between 12 and 24 months after transplantation 6. Some authors documented the partial recovery or stability of BMD values between 2 and 20 years after transplantation 3, 6. In our study, osteoporosis was found in 22 of the 65 recipients (33.8%). Our findings indicate that the prevalence of osteoporosis seems to increase with time since transplantation. According to some recent studies, increasing age is a risk factor for osteoporosis after renal transplantation 6, 9. Indeed, increasing age was also found to be a predisposing factor in our study. High cumulative steroid dose was suggested as an important risk factor for bone loss in renal transplant recipients 1, 3. However, a correlation between the degree of bone loss and the cumulative steroid dose has not been observed in some studies 2, 10, 11. In our study, cumulative steroid dose was found as expected, to be significantly different between all the groups. This difference became striking with prolonged transplantation duration. On the other hand, in our study there was no significant difference in total pulse steroid dose between the groups. It is known that poor nutrition is a predisposing factor responsible for the bone loss in renal transplant recipients 12. In our study, serum albumin level although relatively lower in group 4 was within normal limits in all groups. In conclusion, the results of our study indicate that increasing age and cumulative steroid dose are the most important risk factors of bone loss in renal transplant recipients. Moreover, episodes of acute rejection may contribute to bone loss partially. It is important to identify the recipients who have the pre129 S. TRABULUS y cols. Tabla II. Comparison of four groups with respect to mean values of bone formation and resorption markers, and bone mineral density Group 1 ( < 1 year) (n = 26) BALP (IU/L) Osteocalcin (ng/ml) DOP (nM/mMCr) BMD of femoral neck (g/cm2) BMD of lumbar spine (g/cm2) Femoral neck T-score Lumbar T-score 62.0 39.8 4.3 0.860 0.953 -1.43 -1.38 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± 38.4 31.6 1.6 0.159 0.119 1.0 0.97 Group 2 (1-3 years) (n = 16) 59.0 43.1 4.2 0.819 0.905 -1.50 -2.18 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± 34.3 31.2 2.2 0.127 0.168 1.06 1.1 Group 3 (3-5 years) (n = 12) 52.3 32.3 3.9 0.776 0.863 -1.91 -2.14 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± 16.8 20.4 1.6 0.159 0.253 1.43 1.75 Group 4 (> 5 years) (n = 11) 33.0 16.9 4.5 0.746 0.939 -2.36 -2.16 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± 10.8 9.9 2.6 0.147 0.198 0.82 1.29 p NS NS NS NS NS NS NS BALP: bone alkaline phosphatase, DOP: deoxypyridinoline, BMD: bone mineral density, NS: nonsignificant. disposing risk factors for osteoporosis and take the necessary measurements without delay, since this may improve the expected quality of life after renal transplantation. 6. 7. REFERENCES 8. 1. Wolpaw T, Deal CL, Fleming-Brooks S, Bartucci MR, Schulak JA, Hricik DE: Factors influencing vertebral bone density after renal transplantation. Transplantation 58: 1186-1189, 1994. 2. Julian BA, Laskow DA, Dubovsky J, Dubovsky EV, Curtis JJ, Quarles LD: Rapid loss of vertebral mineral density after renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 325: 544-550, 1991. 3. Torregrosa JV, Campistol JM, Montesinos M, Fenollosa B, Pons F, Martinez de Osaba MJ, Oppenheimer F: Factors involved in the loss of bone mineral density after renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 27: 2224-2225, 1995. 4. Cueto-Manzano AM, Konel S, Hutchison AJ, Crowley V, France MW, Freemont AJ, Adams JE, Mawer B, Gokal R: Bone loss in long-term renal transplantation: histopathology and densitometry analysis. Kidney Int 55: 2021-2029, 1999. 5. Aroldi A: Musculoskeletal, ocular and hematological complications. In: Kahan BD, Ponticelli C (eds). Principles and 9. 10. 11. 12. Practice of Renal Transplantation. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd. p. 699-703, 2001. Grotz WH, Mundinger FA, Gugel B, Exner VM, Kirste G, Schollmeyer PJ: Bone mineral density after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 59: 982-986, 1995. Braun WE: The medical management of the renal transplant recipient. In: Johnson RJ, Feehally J (eds). Comprehensive Clinical Nephrology. Barcelona: Mosby. p. 16.89.10-11, 2000. Kanis JA: Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4: 368-381, 1994. Setterberg L, Sandberg J, Elinder CG, Nordenstrom J: Bone demineralization after renal transplantation: contribution of secondary hyperparathyroidism manifested by hypercalcaemia. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11: 1825-1828, 1996. Almond MK, Kwan JTC, Evans K, Cunningham J: Loss of regional bone mineral density in the first 12 months following renal transplantation. Nephron 66: 52-57, 1994. Massari PU, Garay G, Ulla MR: Bone mineral content in cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc 26: 2646-2648, 1994. Dissanayake IR, Epstein S: The fate of bone after renal transplantation. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 7: 389-395, 1998. 130 " "pdfFichero" => "P7-E204-S140-A2649.pdf" "tienePdf" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/02116995/00000023000000S2/v0_201502091324/X0211699503028755/v0_201502091324/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "35407" "tipo" => "SECCION" "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Suplementos" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/02116995/00000023000000S2/v0_201502091324/X0211699503028755/v0_201502091324/en/P7-E204-S140-A2649.pdf?idApp=UINPBA000064&text.app=https://revistanefrologia.com/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/X0211699503028755?idApp=UINPBA000064" ]
Idioma original: Inglés
año/Mes | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 Noviembre | 3 | 7 | 10 |
2024 Octubre | 31 | 57 | 88 |
2024 Septiembre | 43 | 43 | 86 |
2024 Agosto | 65 | 55 | 120 |
2024 Julio | 34 | 43 | 77 |
2024 Junio | 43 | 32 | 75 |
2024 Mayo | 55 | 32 | 87 |
2024 Abril | 39 | 33 | 72 |
2024 Marzo | 26 | 30 | 56 |
2024 Febrero | 33 | 44 | 77 |
2024 Enero | 29 | 24 | 53 |
2023 Diciembre | 19 | 26 | 45 |
2023 Noviembre | 36 | 30 | 66 |
2023 Octubre | 30 | 28 | 58 |
2023 Septiembre | 18 | 24 | 42 |
2023 Agosto | 31 | 22 | 53 |
2023 Julio | 44 | 30 | 74 |
2023 Junio | 29 | 22 | 51 |
2023 Mayo | 33 | 30 | 63 |
2023 Abril | 28 | 18 | 46 |
2023 Marzo | 19 | 16 | 35 |
2023 Febrero | 23 | 27 | 50 |
2023 Enero | 34 | 12 | 46 |
2022 Diciembre | 39 | 31 | 70 |
2022 Noviembre | 22 | 29 | 51 |
2022 Octubre | 33 | 40 | 73 |
2022 Septiembre | 35 | 29 | 64 |
2022 Agosto | 31 | 42 | 73 |
2022 Julio | 36 | 40 | 76 |
2022 Junio | 28 | 28 | 56 |
2022 Mayo | 26 | 31 | 57 |
2022 Abril | 38 | 41 | 79 |
2022 Marzo | 37 | 40 | 77 |
2022 Febrero | 39 | 40 | 79 |
2022 Enero | 37 | 36 | 73 |
2021 Diciembre | 38 | 40 | 78 |
2021 Noviembre | 40 | 27 | 67 |
2021 Octubre | 40 | 32 | 72 |
2021 Septiembre | 41 | 38 | 79 |
2021 Agosto | 41 | 35 | 76 |
2021 Julio | 43 | 32 | 75 |
2021 Junio | 33 | 24 | 57 |
2021 Mayo | 23 | 31 | 54 |
2021 Abril | 53 | 41 | 94 |
2021 Marzo | 35 | 41 | 76 |
2021 Febrero | 32 | 13 | 45 |
2021 Enero | 24 | 25 | 49 |
2020 Diciembre | 14 | 16 | 30 |
2020 Noviembre | 29 | 16 | 45 |
2020 Octubre | 11 | 14 | 25 |
2020 Septiembre | 13 | 8 | 21 |
2020 Agosto | 35 | 13 | 48 |
2020 Julio | 25 | 6 | 31 |
2020 Junio | 27 | 22 | 49 |
2020 Mayo | 30 | 11 | 41 |
2020 Abril | 39 | 24 | 63 |
2020 Marzo | 29 | 15 | 44 |
2020 Febrero | 49 | 18 | 67 |
2020 Enero | 61 | 27 | 88 |
2019 Diciembre | 42 | 25 | 67 |
2019 Noviembre | 34 | 10 | 44 |
2019 Octubre | 12 | 7 | 19 |
2019 Septiembre | 20 | 20 | 40 |
2019 Agosto | 14 | 14 | 28 |
2019 Julio | 20 | 28 | 48 |
2019 Junio | 15 | 12 | 27 |
2019 Mayo | 13 | 23 | 36 |
2019 Abril | 51 | 37 | 88 |
2019 Marzo | 16 | 20 | 36 |
2019 Febrero | 8 | 13 | 21 |
2019 Enero | 15 | 15 | 30 |
2018 Diciembre | 30 | 27 | 57 |
2018 Noviembre | 16 | 6 | 22 |
2018 Octubre | 37 | 13 | 50 |
2018 Septiembre | 22 | 8 | 30 |
2018 Agosto | 20 | 8 | 28 |
2018 Julio | 20 | 9 | 29 |
2018 Junio | 17 | 6 | 23 |
2018 Mayo | 13 | 10 | 23 |
2018 Abril | 20 | 6 | 26 |
2018 Marzo | 15 | 10 | 25 |
2018 Febrero | 14 | 3 | 17 |
2018 Enero | 15 | 4 | 19 |
2017 Diciembre | 21 | 7 | 28 |
2017 Noviembre | 20 | 5 | 25 |
2017 Octubre | 20 | 9 | 29 |
2017 Septiembre | 18 | 6 | 24 |
2017 Agosto | 15 | 9 | 24 |
2017 Julio | 17 | 5 | 22 |
2017 Junio | 21 | 14 | 35 |
2017 Mayo | 14 | 20 | 34 |
2017 Abril | 9 | 3 | 12 |
2017 Marzo | 6 | 0 | 6 |
2017 Febrero | 14 | 2 | 16 |
2017 Enero | 10 | 3 | 13 |
2016 Diciembre | 24 | 6 | 30 |
2016 Noviembre | 39 | 4 | 43 |
2016 Octubre | 60 | 5 | 65 |
2016 Septiembre | 43 | 2 | 45 |
2016 Agosto | 93 | 0 | 93 |
2016 Julio | 109 | 7 | 116 |
2016 Junio | 65 | 0 | 65 |
2016 Mayo | 77 | 0 | 77 |
2016 Abril | 32 | 0 | 32 |
2016 Marzo | 39 | 0 | 39 |
2016 Febrero | 54 | 0 | 54 |
2016 Enero | 46 | 0 | 46 |
2015 Diciembre | 38 | 0 | 38 |
2015 Noviembre | 37 | 0 | 37 |
2015 Octubre | 34 | 0 | 34 |
2015 Septiembre | 52 | 0 | 52 |
2015 Agosto | 53 | 0 | 53 |
2015 Julio | 41 | 0 | 41 |
2015 Junio | 8 | 0 | 8 |
2015 Mayo | 16 | 0 | 16 |
2015 Abril | 1 | 0 | 1 |