was read the article
array:25 [ "pii" => "S2013251419301397" "issn" => "20132514" "doi" => "10.1016/j.nefroe.2018.11.020" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2019-09-01" "aid" => "585" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Nefrología" "copyrightAnyo" => "2019" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Nefrologia (English Version). 2019;39:506-12" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 500 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 61 "HTML" => 318 "PDF" => 121 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:20 [ "pii" => "S0211699519300281" "issn" => "02116995" "doi" => "10.1016/j.nefro.2018.11.009" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2019-09-01" "aid" => "585" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Nefrología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Nefrologia. 2019;39:506-12" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2706 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 146 "HTML" => 1785 "PDF" => 775 ] ] "es" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original</span>" "titulo" => "Envarsus, una novedad para los nefrólogos del trasplante: estudio observacional retrospectivo" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "506" "paginaFinal" => "512" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Envarsus, a novelty for transplant nephrologists: Observational retrospective study" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figura 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 2103 "Ancho" => 2083 "Tamanyo" => 191940 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Boxplot de: A)<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>dosis diaria de tacrolimus, y B)<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>concentración valle de tacrolimus del periodo basal y conversión estratificado en función de la forma farmacéutica utilizada durante el periodo basal (Prograf o Advagraf). El punto rojo corresponde con la media.</p> <p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">NS: no significativo.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Antonio Franco, Patricio Más-Serrano, Noelia Balibrea, David Rodriguez, Aurora Javaloyes, Marcos Díaz, Isabel Gascón, Amelia Ramon-Lopez, Javier Perez-Contreras, Juan Selva, Ricardo Nalda-Molina" "autores" => array:11 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Antonio" "apellidos" => "Franco" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Patricio" "apellidos" => "Más-Serrano" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Noelia" "apellidos" => "Balibrea" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "David" "apellidos" => "Rodriguez" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Aurora" "apellidos" => "Javaloyes" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Marcos" "apellidos" => "Díaz" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Isabel" "apellidos" => "Gascón" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Amelia" "apellidos" => "Ramon-Lopez" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Javier" "apellidos" => "Perez-Contreras" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Juan" "apellidos" => "Selva" ] 10 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ricardo" "apellidos" => "Nalda-Molina" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S2013251419301397" "doi" => "10.1016/j.nefroe.2018.11.020" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2013251419301397?idApp=UINPBA000064" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0211699519300281?idApp=UINPBA000064" "url" => "/02116995/0000003900000005/v1_201909050649/S0211699519300281/v1_201909050649/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:20 [ "pii" => "S201325141930135X" "issn" => "20132514" "doi" => "10.1016/j.nefroe.2019.10.001" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2019-09-01" "aid" => "597" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Nefrología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Nefrologia (English Version). 2019;39:513-22" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 387 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 62 "HTML" => 232 "PDF" => 93 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Association of hyperkalemia with clinical outcomes in advanced chronic kidney disease" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "513" "paginaFinal" => "522" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Asociación entre hiperkaliemia y evolución clínica en la enfermedad renal crónica avanzada" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0030" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 6" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr6.jpeg" "Alto" => 946 "Ancho" => 2083 "Tamanyo" => 113405 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0080" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Causes of death in subgroups of patients with or without hyperkalemia.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Fernando Caravaca-Fontán, Julián Valladares, Rosa Díaz-Campillejo, Sergio Barroso, Enrique Luna, Francisco Caravaca" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Fernando" "apellidos" => "Caravaca-Fontán" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Julián" "apellidos" => "Valladares" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rosa" "apellidos" => "Díaz-Campillejo" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Sergio" "apellidos" => "Barroso" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Enrique" "apellidos" => "Luna" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Francisco" "apellidos" => "Caravaca" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0211699519300542" "doi" => "10.1016/j.nefro.2019.01.007" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0211699519300542?idApp=UINPBA000064" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S201325141930135X?idApp=UINPBA000064" "url" => "/20132514/0000003900000005/v1_201912172106/S201325141930135X/v1_201912172106/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S2013251419301294" "issn" => "20132514" "doi" => "10.1016/j.nefroe.2019.09.001" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2019-09-01" "aid" => "599" "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Nefrología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Nefrologia (English Version). 2019;39:497-505" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 175 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 43 "HTML" => 73 "PDF" => 59 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Predictive factors of renal impairment in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy: Results from the VACH longitudinal cohort study" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "497" "paginaFinal" => "505" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Factores predictivos de insuficiencia renal en pacientes infectados por el VIH que reciben tratamiento antirretroviral: resultados del estudio de cohortes longitudinal VACH" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 1270 "Ancho" => 2086 "Tamanyo" => 120191 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Distribution of D:A:D risk scores for progression to CKD in the VACH cohort by age and gender.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Pere Domingo, Ignacio Suarez-Lozano, Félix Gutierrez, Vicente Estrada, Hernando Knobel, Rosario Palacios, Antonio Antela, José-Ramón Blanco, Xavier Fulladosa" "autores" => array:10 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Pere" "apellidos" => "Domingo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ignacio" "apellidos" => "Suarez-Lozano" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Félix" "apellidos" => "Gutierrez" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Vicente" "apellidos" => "Estrada" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Hernando" "apellidos" => "Knobel" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rosario" "apellidos" => "Palacios" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Antonio" "apellidos" => "Antela" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José-Ramón" "apellidos" => "Blanco" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Xavier" "apellidos" => "Fulladosa" ] 9 => array:1 [ "colaborador" => "on behalf of VACH" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2013251419301294?idApp=UINPBA000064" "url" => "/20132514/0000003900000005/v1_201912172106/S2013251419301294/v1_201912172106/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:20 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Envarsus, a novelty for transplant nephrologists: Observational retrospective study" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "506" "paginaFinal" => "512" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Antonio Franco, Patricio Más-Serrano, Noelia Balibrea, David Rodriguez, Aurora Javaloyes, Marcos Díaz, Isabel Gascón, Amelia Ramon-Lopez, Javier Perez-Contreras, Juan Selva, Ricardo Nalda-Molina" "autores" => array:11 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Antonio" "apellidos" => "Franco" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "franco_ant@gva.es" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "*" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Patricio" "apellidos" => "Más-Serrano" "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Noelia" "apellidos" => "Balibrea" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "David" "apellidos" => "Rodriguez" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Aurora" "apellidos" => "Javaloyes" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Marcos" "apellidos" => "Díaz" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Isabel" "apellidos" => "Gascón" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Amelia" "apellidos" => "Ramon-Lopez" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Javier" "apellidos" => "Perez-Contreras" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Juan" "apellidos" => "Selva" "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Ricardo" "apellidos" => "Nalda-Molina" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Nefrología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL-Fundación FISABIO), Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Farmacia, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL-Fundación FISABIO), Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Área de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Departamento de Ingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL-Fundación FISABIO), Elche, Alicante, Spain" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Corresponding author</span>." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Envarsus, una novedad para los nefrólogos del trasplante: estudio observacional retrospectivo" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 2105 "Ancho" => 2083 "Tamanyo" => 206261 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Boxplot of: (A) tacrolimus trough concentration – daily dose ratio; and (B) glomerular filtration rate (expressed as CKD-EPI) in the baseline and conversion periods stratified according to the pharmaceutical form used during the baseline period (Prograf or Advagraf). The red dot corresponds to the mean. NS: not significant.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Most of the immunosuppressive therapy regimens used in renal transplantation currently include tacrolimus.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> The effectiveness of the twice-daily-dose formulation of tacrolimus (Prograf) has been proven in multiple studies.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> The conversion of the immediate-release pharmaceutical form to a prolonged-release formulation (Advagraf) has also been studied in depth; in the Spanish study of conversion between the two formulations, Guirado et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> proved its efficacy and safety in 96% of patients, with a conversion base of 1–1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg. The efficacy and safety of these two formulations have been verified in numerous non-inferiority studies and found to be similar.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Tacrolimus is characterised by having a narrow therapeutic margin and a large inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability which requires close pharmacokinetic monitoring. The strong correlation between the area under the curve and the trough level allows personalisation of the dose only by monitoring the trough concentration.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5–7</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">As a result of the combination of poor water solubility, metabolisation of tacrolimus in the intestinal tract and the activity of the P-glycoprotein pump of the intestinal enterocytes, Prograf has low bioavailability of tacrolimus, about 17% in renal transplant recipients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a></p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Lack of adherence to treatment is a common cause of graft loss,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> and the evidence that adherence improves significantly when switching from twice to once daily administration of the drug is another factor in favour of single-daily-dose formulations.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0195"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10–12</span></a> In addition to better adherence, the Spanish study showed that after conversion, patients clearly expressed their preference for prolonged-release tacrolimus, which can be taken once a day.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a></p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A new pharmaceutical form of extended-release tacrolimus has been marketed recently, Envarsus, which could provide a combination of improved adherence and bioavailability; as, Advagraf, it is administered once a day, and its formulation is based on the Meltdose release system,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0210"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> designed to increase the bioavailability of drugs that are poorly soluble in water.</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Studies of conversion from both Prograf and Advagraf to Envarsus have been carried showing that bioavailability Envarsus is superior. Moreover, the Envarsus datasheet summary states that “Patients who are recipients of an allogeneic transplant, maintained with two daily doses of Prograf (immediate release) or Advagraf (once a day) and who require conversion to one daily dose of Envarsus, should have their total daily dose changed at a ratio of 1:0.7 (mg:mg); the maintenance dose of Envarsus should therefore be 30% lower than the dose of Prograf or Advagraf”.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0215"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> However, so far there have been no studies using data obtained from routine practice analysing conversion of the different formulations of tacrolimus to Envarsus.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The aim of this study was to analyse the tacrolimus trough concentrations and dosage regimen after conversion from Prograf or Advagraf to Envarsus in patients with stable renal transplantation, and to assess the impact on renal function.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Material and methods</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This was a retrospective, observational study. We selected renal transplant patients from Hospital General Universitario de Alicante who were converted from Prograf or Advagraf to Envarsus from January 2015 to April 2017. Two periods were defined: baseline (up to the day before the change to Envarsus) and conversion (from the change to Envarsus on). Patients were then stratified according to the pharmaceutical form used during the baseline period, immediate-release (Prograf) or prolonged-release (Advagraf). The maximum follow-up time in both periods was limited to one year. The general immunosuppressive regimen at the time of renal transplantation included tacrolimus (initial dose: Prograf 0.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg/12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h p.o. or Advagraf 0.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg/day p.o.; subsequent doses were adjusted to maintain a tacrolimus trough concentration of 8–10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml for the first month and 6–8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml thereafter, mycophenolate mofetil 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h p.o. or mycophenolic acid 360<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h p.o., basiliximab or thymoglobulin in high-risk patients and corticosteroids in tapering doses.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Inclusion criteria were: adult patients with more than 6 months after receiving a kidney from a cadaver donor with stable renal function who were converted to Envarsus to improve adherence to treatment (in the case of Prograf) or for suspected toxicity or low bioavailability, with at least three tacrolimus trough concentration values at steady state were available in both study periods.</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Blood samples were taken in the trough period (prior to the morning dose). The tacrolimus concentration was determined in whole blood by enzyme immunoassay (Thermo TAC – DRI) (range: 1.2–30<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml).</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The variables were collected retrospectively from the pharmacokinetic reports of the Pharmacy Department's Clinical Pharmacokinetics Unit. The maximum follow-up time in both periods was one year. For each patient we calculated the mean tacrolimus trough concentration, the mean dose, the mean dose-normalised concentration (ratio between the tacrolimus trough concentration and the dose) and mean renal function, assessed by glomerular filtration rate calculated using the CKD-EPI equation. Additionally, intra-individual variability was quantified from the coefficient of variation of the tacrolimus trough concentrations for the two periods and the two formulations.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The quantitative variables are described by mean and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) or median (25th–75th percentile (p25–p75)) and the comparison of the quantitative variables was analysed using a one-way ANOVA or the Mann–Whitney <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">U</span> test depending on the type of distribution of the variables. The level of statistical significance was set as alpha<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05. The statistical and graph analysis used the R statistics software program (<a href="http://www.r-project.org/">http://www.R-project.org</a>).</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Results</span><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The study included 61 patients, 37 males and 24 females, all were Caucasian and transplanted at Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, as they were under the health care covered by the hospital; the mean age of the patients was 52.6 (95% CI: 48.7–54.5) and the mean body weight 69.9<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>kg (95% CI: 66.8–72.9). The mean time after-transplantation when converted to Envarsus was 76.3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>months (95% CI: 21.8–104.2). The number of tacrolimus trough concentrations included in the baseline and conversion periods was 217 and 298, respectively. The mean follow-up of the baseline and conversion periods was 10.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>months (95% CI: 9.0–11.1) and 11.6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>months (95% CI: 10.8–12.4), respectively.</p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Twenty four out of the 61 patients included, were treated with Advagraf and 37 with Prograf. The demographic data stratified by pharmaceutical form (Prograf/Advagraf) are shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the Prograf and Envarsus groups, the median tacrolimus trough concentrations were similar: 6.6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml (p25–p75: 5.2–7.7) vs 6.4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml (p25–p75: 4.7–8.2) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.636), with a daily dose which decreased significantly from 3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg (p25–p75: 2–4.5) to 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg (p25–p75: 1.75–3.0) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><0.001), while the glomerular filtration rate remained stable with values of 53.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml/min/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> (p25–p75: 38.7–66.2) and 50.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml/min/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> (p25–p75: 34.4–62.2) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.06), respectively. The median of the trough concentration normalised for dose of tacrolimus was 35% higher in the conversion period (baseline: 2.3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml/mg [p25–p75: 1.4–3.1] vs conversion: 3.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml/mg [p25–p75: 1.9–4.6]) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#fig0005">Figs. 1 and 2</a>). The intra-individual variability was 21.4% during the baseline period and 15.1% during the conversion period.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Likewise, tacrolimus trough concentrations in the Advagraf and Envarsus groups were not significantly different (median: 5.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml [p25–p75: 4.8–7.0] vs 6.3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml [p25–p75: 5.1–7.7]) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.07), with a median daily dose of 7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg (p25–p75: 4–8) and 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg (p25–p75: 2.75–5.0) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001), and a glomerular filtration rate which remained stable in both periods with values of 36.4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml/min/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> (p25–p75: 28.8–33.65) and 33.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml/min/m<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> (p25–p75: 25.9–59.5) (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.248), respectively. During the conversion period, the median of the trough concentration normalised for the dose of tacrolimus was 83.3% higher than in the baseline period: 0.9<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml/mg (p25–p75: 0.74–1.43) vs 1.65<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml/mg (p25–p75: 1.28–2.85), respectively (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#fig0005">Figs. 1 and 2</a>). As with Prograf, intra-individual variability in the baseline period was higher than that found in the conversion period (25.7% vs 17.4%, respectively).</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Switching pharmaceutical form of tacrolimus resulted in a reduction of the dose of tacrolimus of 42.9% after changing from Advagraf to Envarsus and 33.3% from Prograf to Envarsus, maintaining similar tacrolimus trough concentrations.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Discussion</span><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the population of patients analysed in the present study to maintain stable tacrolimus trough concentrations, the dose of tacrolimus had to be reduced by 42.9% when changing from Advagraf to Envarsus and 33.3% if changing from Prograf to Envarsus. Envarsus is a recently marketed pharmaceutical form with MeltDose technology. MeltDose, developed by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals increases the bioavailability and control the release of fat-soluble drugs in delayed-release pharmaceutical forms.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0210"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> There are therefore two pharmaceutical forms of delayed-release tacrolimus currently available, Advagraf and Envarsus, which are administered once daily. The switch from Prograf or Advagraf to Envarsus has been analysed in a number of different studies.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7,15–18</span></a> However, to our knowledge, this is the first clinical study of conversion of patients treated with immediate- or prolonged-release tacrolimus to Envarsus. Our results are similar to those obtained by other authors. In a study of conversion from an immediate-release form (Prograf) to Envarsus in stable renal transplant recipients, Gaber et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> demonstrated that with a reduction of 30% from the Prograf dose, a similar area under the curve and similar trough concentrations were obtained with Envarsus, but with a significantly lower peak, percentage of fluctuation (change in peak-to-trough concentrations with respect to the mean concentration) and swing (the change in peak-to-trough concentrations with respect to the minimum concentration). The increase in the trough concentration tacrolimus normalised for the dose- or trough concentration/dose ratio is also an indicator of increased bioavailability. In our series concentration/dose ratio was increased by 35% from Prograf to Envarsus and 83.3% from Advagraf to Envarsus. Rostaing et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0220"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> found an increase in the aforementioned ratio two years after transplant.</p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Similar results have been found in the conversion between the two delayed-release forms (Advagraf to Envarsus). In the ASTCOFF pharmacokinetic study of conversion with two sequences (Prograf-Envarsus-Advagraf and Prograf-Advagraf-Envarsus), Tremblay et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> concluded that to achieve the same degree of exposure the dose of Advagraf had to be increased by 8% with respect to Prograf, and when switching from Advagraf or Prograf to Envarsus the dose had to be reduced by 36% and 30% respectively. These results are very similar to those obtained in our study.</p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In a cohort study, Niioka et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0230"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> concluded that to maintain the same area under the curve, a larger dose of Advagraf is necessary than of Prograf, as both the area under the curve and the trough concentration were approximately 25% lower with Advagraf than Prograf, showing that Advagraf had worse bioavailability. In our study, we also showed that the bioavailability of Advagraf is slightly lower than that of Prograf, since the dose reduction necessary to maintain the same levels was 9.6% higher.</p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This dose reduction would not only be necessary in conversion, but also in induction. As shown in the Budde et al. study,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> which compared recipients with Envarsus versus Prograf from the time of the transplant to the end of one year of follow-up. The Envarsus group reached the target levels faster than the Prograf group, although it should be noted that they received a higher initial dose (0.17<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg compared to 0.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg), and at 3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>weeks the dose needed to reach the same levels was lower. These data reinforce the idea of a greater initial absorption of Envarsus than Advagraf. In other studies it has been demonstrated the inferiority of Advagraf vs Prograf in achieving levels during the immediate postoperative period.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0235"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18,20</span></a> Wlodarczyk et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0235"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> showed that using the same starting dose, 0.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/kg/24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h, the area under curve for tacrolimus on day<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1 was 30% lower for Advagraf than for Prograf (232 and 361<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h/ml, respectively), and that it was comparable on day 14, but using higher doses of Advagraf. The KDIGO guidelines specifically conclude that the sooner therapeutic levels of calcineurin inhibitors are reached, the more effective will be in preventing acute rejection<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21</span></a>; this illustrate the importance of choosing the pharmaceutical presentation of the drug that will most quickly reach therapeutic levels in the immediate postoperative period.</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The better bioavailability and/or reduction in apparent clearance varies over the time, as the recipients in the study by Budde et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> received a 14% lower dose of tacrolimus at one year. In the extension of that study, Rostaing et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0220"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> showed that the dose of Envarsus was 24% lower than that of Prograf at 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>months, these are similar data to the obtained in our study. Bunnapradist et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0255"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> randomised a group of recipients with stable renal transplant to Prograf or Envarsus and observed a progressive reduction of up to 25% in the administered dose of Envarsus, with no differences in trough levels.</p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is noteworthy that the aforementioned studies include a not-insignificant number of African-American recipients,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7,15,17,22</span></a> a population that has been shown to require up to twice the dose<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0220"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> as compared with the Caucasian population to reach the same trough levels.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0260"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a> Our study population is homogeneous, including only Caucasian patients and coming from a very limited geographical area, which would eliminate possible confounding factors.</p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The fact that lack of adherence is a common cause of graft loss<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0190"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> and that adherence significantly improves if the medication is changed from twice to a single daily dose,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0195"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> the use of a once-daily tacrolimus formulation should be an absolute requirement, especially when the evening absorption of Prograf is lower than the morning absorption.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24,25</span></a> In addition, the use of Advagraf reduces the intra-individual coefficient of variation to 40% compared to Prograf, which reinforces the idea of using a once-a-day pharmaceutical form of administration compared to two administrations.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0275"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26–28</span></a> In our study, intra-individual variability also decreased when converting patients from Prograf or Advagraf to Envarsus (CV: 21.4% vs 15.1% and 25.7% vs 17.4%, respectively).</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Due to the narrow therapeutic margin of tacrolimus and given the different pharmacokinetics of Prograf, Advagraf and Envarsus, these drugs are not bioequivalent and interchangeable, so changes in the formulations could lead to significant adverse effects. Therefore, close pharmacokinetic monitoring is recommended when switching formulations<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a>; hence the high number of trough concentration determinations made in our study after conversion to Envarsus (baseline period: 217 vs conversion period: 298).</p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">One of the most important limitations of our study is its retrospective observational nature, and the fact that trough tacrolimus determinations were carried out within a routine clinical practice in an outpatient setting. Therefore, in the two periods the follow-up were not exactly the same and there was large variability in the time from transplant to conversion for both formulations (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>). However, as said, our results are comparable to previous studies, although the percentage dose reduction in the Advagraf group is higher than that described in other studies.</p><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In conclusion, our study shows that Envarsus is a pharmaceutical form of tacrolimus that may provide benefits for immunosuppression in renal transplantation, besides being a single daily dose formulation, the improved bioavailability enables a significant reduction in the dose tacrolimus achieving a similar trough concentration, without variations in renal function.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Conflicts of interest</span><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:10 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1276536" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1180636" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1276535" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1180637" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Material and methods" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Conflicts of interest" ] 9 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2018-04-11" "fechaAceptado" => "2018-11-09" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1180636" "palabras" => array:7 [ 0 => "Renal transplant" 1 => "Bioavailability" 2 => "Conversion" 3 => "Tacrolimus" 4 => "Envarsus" 5 => "Advagraf" 6 => "Prograf" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1180637" "palabras" => array:7 [ 0 => "Trasplante renal" 1 => "Biodisponibilidad" 2 => "Conversión" 3 => "Tacrolimus" 4 => "Envarsus" 5 => "Advagraf" 6 => "Prograf" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The aim of this study was to evaluate the trough concentrations (Cp<span class="elsevierStyleInf">trough</span>) and the tacrolimus dosage regimen after the conversion of Prograf or Advagraf to Envarsus (new pharmaceutical form with MeltDose technology that improves the absorption of fat-soluble drugs) in patients with stable renal transplantation, and their renal function.</p><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">We selected stable renal transplant patients who were converted to Envarsus. Two periods were defined: Baseline and Conversion (Envarsus) and they were stratified according to the pharmaceutical form used in the Baseline period. Sixty-one patients were included (24 with Advagraf and 37 with Prograf), with an average age of 52<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>years. The mean post-transplant time at the time of conversion to Envarsus was 76.3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>months and the mean follow-up in the Baseline and Conversion period was 10.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>months and 11.6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>months, respectively.</p><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">In the Prograf and Envarsus group, the Cp<span class="elsevierStyleInf">trough</span> medians were 6.6 vs 6.4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.636), with a mean daily dose that decreased significantly from 3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg to 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001), respectively, maintaining the filtration rate.</p><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The median Cp<span class="elsevierStyleInf">trough</span> values in the Advagraf and Envarsus groups were 5.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml and 6.3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.07), with a median daily dose of 7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg and 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001), respectively, and the same renal function.</p><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">In stable renal transplant patients, the conversion from Advagraf to Envarsus has allowed the dose of tacrolimus to be reduced by 42.9% and, in the case of Prograf, by 33.3%, maintaining similar Cp<span class="elsevierStyleInf">trough</span> values, without renal function being altered.</p></span>" ] "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar las concentraciones valle (Cp<span class="elsevierStyleInf">valle</span>) y la pauta posológica de tacrolimus tras la conversión de Prograf o Advagraf a Envarsus (nueva forma farmacéutica con tecnología Meltdose que mejora la absorción de fármacos liposolubles) en pacientes con trasplante renal estable, y su función renal.</p><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se seleccionaron los pacientes trasplantados renales estables que fueron convertidos a Envarsus. Se definieron dos periodos: basal y conversión (Envarsus), y se estratificaron en función de la forma farmacéutica utilizada en el periodo basal. Se incluyeron 61 pacientes (24 con Advagraf y 37 con Prograf), con una edad media de 52<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>años. El tiempo medio postrasplante en el momento de la conversión a Envarsus fue de 76,3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>meses y el seguimiento medio en el periodo basal y conversión fue de 10,1 y 11,6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>meses, respectivamente.</p><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">En el grupo Prograf y Envarsus las medianas Cp<span class="elsevierStyleInf">valle</span> fueron 6,6 vs 6,4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml (p<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,636), con una dosis diaria media que disminuyó significativamente de 3 a 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg (p<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,001), respectivamente, manteniendo el filtrado renal.</p><p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Las medianas Cp<span class="elsevierStyleInf">valle</span> en los grupos Advagraf y Envarsus fueron 5,7 y 6,3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ng/ml (p<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,07), con una mediana de dosis diaria de 7 y 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg (p<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0,001), respectivamente, e igual función renal.</p><p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">En pacientes trasplantados renales estables la conversión de Advagraf a Envarsus ha permitido reducir la dosis de tacrolimus un 42,9% y la de Prograf un 33,3% para mantener unas Cp<span class="elsevierStyleInf">valle</span> similares, sin que se altere la función renal.</p></span>" ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Franco A, Más-Serrano P, Balibrea N, Rodriguez D, Javaloyes A, Díaz M, et al. Envarsus, una novedad para los nefrólogos del trasplante: estudio observacional retrospectivo. Nefrología. 2019;39:506–512.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:3 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 2103 "Ancho" => 2083 "Tamanyo" => 200026 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Boxplot of: (A) tacrolimus trough concentration; and (B) tacrolimus trough concentration in the baseline and conversion periods stratified according to the pharmaceutical form used during the baseline period (Prograf or Advagraf). The red dot corresponds to the mean. NS: not significant.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 2105 "Ancho" => 2083 "Tamanyo" => 206261 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Boxplot of: (A) tacrolimus trough concentration – daily dose ratio; and (B) glomerular filtration rate (expressed as CKD-EPI) in the baseline and conversion periods stratified according to the pharmaceutical form used during the baseline period (Prograf or Advagraf). The red dot corresponds to the mean. NS: not significant.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Advagraf \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="center" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Prograf \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Patients, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">24 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">37 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Age (years), mean (95% CI) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">56 (51–60) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">50 (47–54) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Gender (M/F), % (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">60.9/39.1 (14/9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">60.5/39.5 (23/15) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Weight, kg; mean (95% CI) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">72.4 (67.7–77.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">68.1 (64.0–72.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Time post-transplant, months; mean (95% CI) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">65.1 (43.1–87.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">97.8 (69.1–126.5) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Baseline period follow-up, months; mean (95% CI) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8.6 (6.6–10.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">11.0 (9.8–12.1) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Conversion period follow-up, months; mean (95% CI) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">11.5 (10.1–12.9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">11.7 (10.7–12.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Total number of trough Cp/patient baseline period, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span>/mean \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">71/3.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">146/3.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Total number of trough Cp/patient conversion period, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span>/mean \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">125/5.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">173/4.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2183488.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Baseline demographic data of patients converted to Envarsus stratified according to the pharmaceutical form used during the baseline period (Prograf or Advagraf).</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0015" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:29 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Kidney" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Hart" 1 => "J.M. Smith" 2 => "M.A. Skeans" 3 => "S.K. Gustafson" 4 => "D.E. Stewart" 5 => "W.S. Cherikh" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/ajt.13666" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Transplant" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "16" "numero" => "Suppl. 2" "paginaInicial" => "11" "paginaFinal" => "46" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26755262" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised trial data" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A.C. Webster" 1 => "R.C. Woodroffe" 2 => "R.S. Taylor" 3 => "J.R. Chapman" 4 => "J.C. Craig" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/bmj.38569.471007.AE" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "BMJ" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "331" "paginaInicial" => "810" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16157605" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Efficacy and safety of conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in a large cohort of stable kidney transplant recipients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. Guirado" 1 => "C. Cantarell" 2 => "A. Franco" 3 => "E.G. Huertas" 4 => "A.S. Fructuoso" 5 => "A. Fernandez" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03571.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Transplant" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "11" "paginaInicial" => "1965" "paginaFinal" => "1971" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21668633" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "OSAKA trial: A randomized, controlled trial comparing tacrolimus QD and BD in kidney transplantation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. Albano" 1 => "B. Banas" 2 => "J.L. Klempnauer" 3 => "M. Glyda" 4 => "O. Viklicky" 5 => "N. Kamar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Transplantation" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "96" "paginaInicial" => "897" "paginaFinal" => "903" ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Conversion of stable kidney transplant recipients from a twice daily Prograf-based regimen to a once daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Alloway" 1 => "S. Steinberg" 2 => "K. Khalil" 3 => "S. Gourishankar" 4 => "J. Miller" 5 => "D. Norman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.222" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Transplant Proc" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "37" "paginaInicial" => "867" "paginaFinal" => "870" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15848559" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Conversion of stable liver transplant recipients from a twice-daily Prograf-based regimen to a once-daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S. Florman" 1 => "R. Alloway" 2 => "M. Kalayoglu" 3 => "K. Lake" 4 => "T. Bak" 5 => "A. Klein" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.11.086" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Transplant Proc" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "37" "paginaInicial" => "1211" "paginaFinal" => "1213" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15848672" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus capsules to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT): a phase 2 trial of stable renal transplant recipients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A.O. Gaber" 1 => "R.R. Alloway" 2 => "K. Bodziak" 3 => "B. Kaplan" 4 => "S. Bunnapradist" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/TP.0b013e3182962cc1" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Transplantation" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "96" "paginaInicial" => "191" "paginaFinal" => "197" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23715050" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0185" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Ficha Técnica Prograf. Agencia Española del Medicamento. Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://cima.aemps.es/cima/pdfs/es/ft/63189/FT_63189.html.pdf">https://cima.aemps.es/cima/pdfs/es/ft/63189/FT_63189.html.pdf</a> [accessed 6.04.18]." ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0190" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J. Sellares" 1 => "D.G. de Freitas" 2 => "M. Mengel" 3 => "J. Reeve" 4 => "G. Einecke" 5 => "B. Sis" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Transplant" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "12" "paginaInicial" => "388" "paginaFinal" => "399" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22081892" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0195" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "S.A. Eisen" 1 => "D.K. Miller" 2 => "R.S. Woodward" 3 => "E. Spitznagel" 4 => "T.R. Przybeck" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arch Intern Med" "fecha" => "1990" "volumen" => "150" "paginaInicial" => "1881" "paginaFinal" => "1884" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2102668" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0200" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A.J. Claxton" 1 => "J. Cramer" 2 => "C. Pierce" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80109-0" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Ther" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "23" "paginaInicial" => "1296" "paginaFinal" => "1310" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11558866" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0205" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Effect of medication dosing frequency on adherence in chronic diseases" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "S.D. Saini" 1 => "P. Schoenfeld" 2 => "K. Kaulback" 3 => "M.C. Dubinsky" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:4 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Manag Care" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "15" "paginaInicial" => "22" ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0210" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Meltdose tacrolimus pharmacokinetics" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "M. Baraldo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.02.002" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Transplant Proc" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "48" "paginaInicial" => "420" "paginaFinal" => "423" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27109969" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0215" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Ficha Técnica Envarsus. Agencia Española del Medicamento. Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.aemps.gob.es/cima/pdfs//ft/114935001/FT_114935001.pdf">https://www.aemps.gob.es/cima/pdfs//ft/114935001/FT_114935001.pdf</a> [accessed 6.04.18]." ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0220" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients: two-year results of phase 3, double-blind randomized trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. Rostaing" 1 => "S. Bunnapradist" 2 => "J.M. Grinyo" 3 => "K. Ciechanowski" 4 => "J.E. Denny" 5 => "H.T. Silva" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.10.024" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Kidney Dis" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "67" "paginaInicial" => "648" "paginaFinal" => "659" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717860" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0225" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A steady-state head-to-head pharmacokinetic comparison of all FK-506 (tacrolimus) formulations (ASTCOFF): an open-label, prospective, randomized, two-arm, three-period crossover study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "S. Tremblay" 1 => "V. Nigro" 2 => "J. Weinberg" 3 => "E.S. Woodle" 4 => "R.R. Alloway" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Transplant" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "17" "paginaInicial" => "432" "paginaFinal" => "442" ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0230" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once- and twice-daily tacrolimus in the early stage after renal transplantation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "T. Niioka" 1 => "S. Satoh" 2 => "H. Kagaya" 3 => "K. Numakura" 4 => "T. Inoue" 5 => "M. Saito" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/TP.0b013e31826bc400" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Transplantation" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "94" "paginaInicial" => "1013" "paginaFinal" => "1019" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23073468" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0235" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pharmacokinetics for once- versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplantation: a randomized, open-label trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "Z. Wlodarczyk" 1 => "J.P. Squifflet" 2 => "M. Ostrowski" 3 => "P. Rigotti" 4 => "S. Stefoni" 5 => "F. Citterio" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02794.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Transplant" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "9" "paginaInicial" => "2505" "paginaFinal" => "2513" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19681813" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0240" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplants: one-year results of Phase III, double-blind, randomized trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "K. Budde" 1 => "S. Bunnapradist" 2 => "J.M. Grinyo" 3 => "K. Ciechanowski" 4 => "J.E. Denny" 5 => "H.T. Silva" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/ajt.12955" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Transplant" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "14" "paginaInicial" => "2796" "paginaFinal" => "2806" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25278376" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0245" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Tacrolimus once daily (ADVAGRAF) versus twice daily (PROGRAF) in de novo renal transplantation: a randomized phase III study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "B.K. Kramer" 1 => "B. Charpentier" 2 => "L. Backman" 3 => "H.T. Silva" 4 => "G. Mondragon-Ramirez" 5 => "E. Cassuto-Viguier" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Transplant" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "10" "paginaInicial" => "2632" "paginaFinal" => "2643" ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0250" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Note for Guidance on Modified Release Oral and Transdermal Dosage Forms: Section II (Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Evaluation). Available from: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003126.pdf">http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003126.pdf</a> [accessed 6.04.18]." ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0255" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended release tacrolimus (LCPT): the phase III randomized MELT trial" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S. Bunnapradist" 1 => "K. Ciechanowski" 2 => "P. West-Thielke" 3 => "S. Mulgaonkar" 4 => "L. Rostaing" 5 => "B. Vasudev" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/ajt.12035" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Transplant" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "13" "paginaInicial" => "760" "paginaFinal" => "769" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23279614" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0260" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants: a perspective on ethnic differences" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "N.L. Dirks" 1 => "B. Huth" 2 => "C.R. Yates" 3 => "B. Meibohm" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.5414/cpp42701" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "42" "paginaInicial" => "701" "paginaFinal" => "718" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15624287" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0265" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Advagraf. European Public Assessment Report (EPAR); 2018. Available from: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medicines/000712/human_med_000629.jsp%26mid=WC0b01ac058001d124">http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medicines/000712/human_med_000629.jsp∣=WC0b01ac058001d124</a> [updated 29.01.18; accessed 6.04.18]." ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0270" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: twice daily versus once daily dosing" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "K.L. Hardinger" 1 => "J.M. Park" 2 => "M.A. Schnitzler" 3 => "M.J. Koch" 4 => "B.W. Miller" 5 => "D.C. Brennan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00383.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Transplant" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "621" "paginaFinal" => "625" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15023155" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0275" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Lower variability of tacrolimus trough concentration after conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in stable kidney transplant recipients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.J. Wu" 1 => "C.Y. Cheng" 2 => "C.H. Chen" 3 => "W.P. Wu" 4 => "C.H. Cheng" 5 => "D.M. Yu" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/TP.0b013e3182292426" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Transplantation" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "92" "paginaInicial" => "648" "paginaFinal" => "652" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912349" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0280" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Lower variability in 24-hour exposure during once-daily compared to twice-daily tacrolimus formulation in kidney transplantation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "F. Stifft" 1 => "L.M. Stolk" 2 => "N. Undre" 3 => "J.P. van Hooff" 4 => "M.H. Christiaans" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Transplantation" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "97" "paginaInicial" => "775" "paginaFinal" => "780" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0285" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Advagraf, a once-daily prolonged release tacrolimus formulation, in kidney transplantation: literature review and guidelines from a panel of experts" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S. Caillard" 1 => "B. Moulin" 2 => "F. Buron" 3 => "C. Mariat" 4 => "V. Audard" 5 => "P. Grimbert" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/tri.12674" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Transpl Int" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "860" "paginaFinal" => "869" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26373896" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0290" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Clinical pharmacokinetics of once-daily tacrolimus in solid-organ transplant patients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "C.E. Staatz" 1 => "S.E. Tett" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s40262-015-0282-2" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Pharmacokinet" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "54" "paginaInicial" => "993" "paginaFinal" => "1025" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038096" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/20132514/0000003900000005/v1_201912172106/S2013251419301397/v1_201912172106/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "42660" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Original articles" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/20132514/0000003900000005/v1_201912172106/S2013251419301397/v1_201912172106/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA000064&text.app=https://revistanefrologia.com/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2013251419301397?idApp=UINPBA000064" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 October | 57 | 54 | 111 |
2024 September | 76 | 44 | 120 |
2024 August | 131 | 84 | 215 |
2024 July | 104 | 41 | 145 |
2024 June | 87 | 72 | 159 |
2024 May | 79 | 50 | 129 |
2024 April | 64 | 46 | 110 |
2024 March | 69 | 37 | 106 |
2024 February | 51 | 57 | 108 |
2024 January | 43 | 35 | 78 |
2023 December | 41 | 28 | 69 |
2023 November | 89 | 40 | 129 |
2023 October | 129 | 34 | 163 |
2023 September | 105 | 42 | 147 |
2023 August | 108 | 31 | 139 |
2023 July | 109 | 53 | 162 |
2023 June | 121 | 36 | 157 |
2023 May | 112 | 186 | 298 |
2023 April | 51 | 27 | 78 |
2023 March | 85 | 29 | 114 |
2023 February | 85 | 20 | 105 |
2023 January | 79 | 33 | 112 |
2022 December | 75 | 46 | 121 |
2022 November | 92 | 39 | 131 |
2022 October | 91 | 56 | 147 |
2022 September | 62 | 34 | 96 |
2022 August | 70 | 44 | 114 |
2022 July | 41 | 58 | 99 |
2022 June | 60 | 54 | 114 |
2022 May | 67 | 40 | 107 |
2022 April | 69 | 50 | 119 |
2022 March | 76 | 51 | 127 |
2022 February | 82 | 47 | 129 |
2022 January | 99 | 30 | 129 |
2021 December | 54 | 36 | 90 |
2021 November | 89 | 50 | 139 |
2021 October | 92 | 72 | 164 |
2021 September | 64 | 48 | 112 |
2021 August | 80 | 45 | 125 |
2021 July | 49 | 48 | 97 |
2021 June | 48 | 33 | 81 |
2021 May | 72 | 47 | 119 |
2021 April | 122 | 82 | 204 |
2021 March | 117 | 44 | 161 |
2021 February | 74 | 43 | 117 |
2021 January | 57 | 31 | 88 |
2020 December | 65 | 15 | 80 |
2020 November | 49 | 17 | 66 |
2020 October | 52 | 32 | 84 |
2020 September | 48 | 36 | 84 |
2020 August | 35 | 22 | 57 |
2020 July | 39 | 8 | 47 |
2020 June | 31 | 29 | 60 |
2020 May | 34 | 16 | 50 |
2020 April | 74 | 25 | 99 |
2020 March | 68 | 13 | 81 |
2020 February | 61 | 26 | 87 |
2020 January | 104 | 41 | 145 |
2019 December | 117 | 39 | 156 |
2019 November | 60 | 25 | 85 |