Effect of Operating Surgeon on Outcome of Arteriovenous Fistula Formation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.11.018Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objective

To study whether surgical trainees can perform arteriovenous fistula (AVF) surgery to a standard comparable to consultants.

Patients and methods

Retrospective study of all vascular access surgery over a three year period at a single centre. The operating surgeon was identified from theatre log books and categorised by grade. Fistula patency was used as the primary outcome measure and was determined from patients' case-notes and from a prospectively collected electronic record of dialysis sessions. Patency was defined as “used for dialysis” if the AVF was used for dialysis for at least 6 consecutive sessions.

Results

One hundred and eighty six cases were used for analysis. In 60 cases (32%) the operating surgeon was the consultant, in 53 cases (29%) a trainee was supervised by a consultant, in 56 cases (30%) a trainee performed the operation independently and in 17 cases (9%) the grade of the operating surgeon could not be established. Primary and primary assisted patency rates by operating surgeon did not differ significantly (P-values 0.25 and 0.16 respectively). Age of the patient was the only predictor of patency failure in a multivariate model. Grade of operating surgeon (logrank test χ2 = 3.1, p = 0.38) and type of fistula (logrank test χ2 = 2.3, p = 0.52) were not significantly related to the primary survival of the fistula.

Conclusions

This study showed no significant differences in AVF patency rates between trainee and consultant surgeons. Allocation of appropriate cases can result in trainees obtaining similar outcomes as consultants, demonstrating that dialysis access surgery can provide good training opportunities for junior doctors without detriment to patient care.

Keywords

Arteriovenous fistula
Vascular access surgery
Education

Cited by (0)