TY - JOUR T1 - ESHOL study reanalysis: All-cause mortality considered by competing risks and time-dependent covariates for renal transplantation JO - Nefrología (English Edition) T2 - AU - Maduell,Francisco AU - Moreso,Francesc AU - Mora-Macià,Josep AU - Pons,Mercedes AU - Ramos,Rosa AU - Carreras,Jordi AU - Soler,Jordi AU - Torres,Ferrán SN - 20132514 M3 - 10.1016/j.nefroe.2016.02.008 DO - 10.1016/j.nefroe.2016.02.008 UR - https://revistanefrologia.com/en-eshol-study-reanalysis-all-cause-mortality-articulo-S2013251416000298 AB - BackgroundThe ESHOL study showed that post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) reduces all-cause mortality versus hemodialysis. However, during the observation period, 355 patients prematurely completed the study and, according to the study design, these patients were censored at the time of premature termination. MethodsThe aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of patients who discontinued the study. ResultsDuring follow-up, 207 patients died while under treatment and 47 patients died after discontinuation of the study. Compared with patients maintained on hemodialysis, those randomized to OL-HDF had lower all-cause mortality (12.4 versus 9.46 per 100 patient-years, hazard ratio and 95% CI: 0.76; [0.59 to 0.98], P=0.031). For all-cause mortality by time-dependent covariates and competing risks for transplantation, the time-dependent Cox analysis showed very similar results to the main analysis with a hazard ratio of 0.77 (0.60 to 0.99, P=0.043). ConclusionThe results of this analysis of the ESHOL trial confirm that post-dilution OL-HDF reduces all-cause mortality versus hemodialysis in prevalent patients. The original results of the ESHOL study, which censored patients discontinuing the study for any reason, were confirmed in the present ITT population without censures and when all-cause mortality was considered by time-dependent and competing risks for transplantation. ER -